Calvin Thomas Conservative Racism Shows On Twitter - Video
Wow. Calvin Thomas, the conservative columnist,is really racist on Twitter. I accused him of defending Washington politicians when some were accused of child trafficking and he claims he was defending them from abortionists who were killing black babies? Wild. Then he says I was mentioning black folks when none of my tweets did. Okay!
via IFTTT
http://youtu.be/zSLjAM4F7vw
Sunday, May 22, 2016
Calvin Thomas Conservative Racism Shows On Twitter
Calvin Thomas Conservative Racism Shows On Twitter - Video
Wow. Calvin Thomas, the conservative columnist,is really racist on Twitter. I accused him of defending Washington politicians when some were accused of child trafficking and he claims he was defending them from abortionists who were killing black babies? Wild. Then he says I was mentioning black folks when none of my tweets did. Okay!
via IFTTT
http://youtu.be/zSLjAM4F7vw
Wow. Calvin Thomas, the conservative columnist,is really racist on Twitter. I accused him of defending Washington politicians when some were accused of child trafficking and he claims he was defending them from abortionists who were killing black babies? Wild. Then he says I was mentioning black folks when none of my tweets did. Okay!
via IFTTT
http://youtu.be/zSLjAM4F7vw
SNTIC Gives LVCC Expansion Priority Over Oakland Raiders Las Vegas NFL Stadium
SNTIC Gives LVCC Expansion Priority Over Oakland Raiders Las Vegas NFL Stadium - Video
SNTIC Gives LVCC Expansion Priority Over Oakland Raiders Las Vegas NFL Stadium Oakland Raiders Owner Mark Davis was treated like Moses who came from the promised land of the NFL to Las Vegas to bless the city and Clark County and Nevada with the promise of a pro football team - his own. He wowed the media at Nevada Governor Brian Sandoval's Southern Nevada Tourism And Infrastructure Commission when he spoke on April 28th. Many of the reports coming out of that meeting would have you believe the Raiders were already packing up and leaving Oakland for Las Vegas. Formalities like the $750 million hotel tax subsidy that Mark Davis, Majestic Reallty, and billionaire Sheldon Adelson's Las Vegas Sands Corp were asking for were completely ignored by all but the local newspaper reporter from the Las Vegas Daily Review - and that person works for Sheldon Adelson. Still, SNTIC website posts and reports contained clear warnings that Davis and Adelson were far from getting what they wanted. The media was so obsessed with what the NFL would do with Davis proposal, it forgot to even learn if a $1.4 billion stadium mostly paid for by hotel taxes was what Nevada and Las Vegas really wanted? One NFL media type even remarked on Twitter "We shall see this summer", even as I told him the fate of Davis proposal would be determined on May 26th, and not later. He, liked others, automatically assumed Davis proposal was going straight to the Nevada Legislature in a special session. The page for the Governor's commission's website provided warning: that, on May 26th 2016, the group would prioritize which project was most important to implement first. Well, a simple visit to the website now will reveal that answer: the expansion of The Las Vegas Convention Center. In letters larger than the rest, the desire to give the go-ahead for this much-need new phase is described like this: "Convention Center Legislature Recommendation". Then, below those words are these: "Stadium Proposal Follow-Up". In other words, the Commission has not even finished, let alone really fully started, analysis of Davis' proposal. Indeed, the consultant to the commission intended to have an analysis, but what was out on the website are two documents that are very damaging to Mark Davis' desire to have his team in Sin City. One document describes the percentage of public money that the Mark Davis proposal calls for, and compares that to other NFL Stadiums - the Davis proposal would result in the largest tax subsidy in NFL history. And that does not include the $200 million from tax increment financing - add that (and that is a conservative estimate) and the subsidy is almost at, if not over, $1 billion. The other document details the process of evaluating the 42 acre UNLV site that is next to two runways at McClarren International Airport - that calls for far more than height constraints and noise concerns. The whole of what needs to be looked at, alone, points to a process that could take four months to complete. And if that UNLV site is not used, then it's not as if other sites will not have their own issues that have to be worked out. Nevada is not going to hold up investing in the growth of its convention and tourism industry for the development of a football stadium, even if it's for the NFL. Mark Davis Has An Oakland Lease Problem The minutes from the April 28th meeting reveal another problem for Mark Davis: the lease the Oakland Raiders signed contains what the Coliseum Joint Powers Authority Executive Director Soctt McKibben has called "warrants" or markers to determine where both the team and the City of Oakland and Alameda County were in progress toward a new stadium at the Coliseum. Davis told the SNTIC that his intent was to play the Raiders in Oakland for the three year lease and then move to Las Vegas. The problem is that's not what the Coliseum JPA lease calls for. If the Raiders are in violation of the lease or about to be, is up to the NFL and the City of Oakland, but from this blogger's perspective, it certainly looks like Davis is close to being in that position. It's one thing to make a statement pointing to a possible violation, but on the other hand the last time the Raiders suggested they might break the Coliseum Master Lease agreement was 1997, and the City of Oakland did sue the Raiders on that basis. Right now, Oakland has no stomach to file a lawsuit against the Raiders, preferring to handle the problem behind closed doors. But will the NFL allow a member club to act in what its host community believes is a less than good faith manner? The NFL Relocation Bylaws call for good faith bargaining - something Oakland Officials have told me the Raiders have not done to date. Stay tuned.
via IFTTT
http://youtu.be/QMg8-SEpHQA
SNTIC Gives LVCC Expansion Priority Over Oakland Raiders Las Vegas NFL Stadium Oakland Raiders Owner Mark Davis was treated like Moses who came from the promised land of the NFL to Las Vegas to bless the city and Clark County and Nevada with the promise of a pro football team - his own. He wowed the media at Nevada Governor Brian Sandoval's Southern Nevada Tourism And Infrastructure Commission when he spoke on April 28th. Many of the reports coming out of that meeting would have you believe the Raiders were already packing up and leaving Oakland for Las Vegas. Formalities like the $750 million hotel tax subsidy that Mark Davis, Majestic Reallty, and billionaire Sheldon Adelson's Las Vegas Sands Corp were asking for were completely ignored by all but the local newspaper reporter from the Las Vegas Daily Review - and that person works for Sheldon Adelson. Still, SNTIC website posts and reports contained clear warnings that Davis and Adelson were far from getting what they wanted. The media was so obsessed with what the NFL would do with Davis proposal, it forgot to even learn if a $1.4 billion stadium mostly paid for by hotel taxes was what Nevada and Las Vegas really wanted? One NFL media type even remarked on Twitter "We shall see this summer", even as I told him the fate of Davis proposal would be determined on May 26th, and not later. He, liked others, automatically assumed Davis proposal was going straight to the Nevada Legislature in a special session. The page for the Governor's commission's website provided warning: that, on May 26th 2016, the group would prioritize which project was most important to implement first. Well, a simple visit to the website now will reveal that answer: the expansion of The Las Vegas Convention Center. In letters larger than the rest, the desire to give the go-ahead for this much-need new phase is described like this: "Convention Center Legislature Recommendation". Then, below those words are these: "Stadium Proposal Follow-Up". In other words, the Commission has not even finished, let alone really fully started, analysis of Davis' proposal. Indeed, the consultant to the commission intended to have an analysis, but what was out on the website are two documents that are very damaging to Mark Davis' desire to have his team in Sin City. One document describes the percentage of public money that the Mark Davis proposal calls for, and compares that to other NFL Stadiums - the Davis proposal would result in the largest tax subsidy in NFL history. And that does not include the $200 million from tax increment financing - add that (and that is a conservative estimate) and the subsidy is almost at, if not over, $1 billion. The other document details the process of evaluating the 42 acre UNLV site that is next to two runways at McClarren International Airport - that calls for far more than height constraints and noise concerns. The whole of what needs to be looked at, alone, points to a process that could take four months to complete. And if that UNLV site is not used, then it's not as if other sites will not have their own issues that have to be worked out. Nevada is not going to hold up investing in the growth of its convention and tourism industry for the development of a football stadium, even if it's for the NFL. Mark Davis Has An Oakland Lease Problem The minutes from the April 28th meeting reveal another problem for Mark Davis: the lease the Oakland Raiders signed contains what the Coliseum Joint Powers Authority Executive Director Soctt McKibben has called "warrants" or markers to determine where both the team and the City of Oakland and Alameda County were in progress toward a new stadium at the Coliseum. Davis told the SNTIC that his intent was to play the Raiders in Oakland for the three year lease and then move to Las Vegas. The problem is that's not what the Coliseum JPA lease calls for. If the Raiders are in violation of the lease or about to be, is up to the NFL and the City of Oakland, but from this blogger's perspective, it certainly looks like Davis is close to being in that position. It's one thing to make a statement pointing to a possible violation, but on the other hand the last time the Raiders suggested they might break the Coliseum Master Lease agreement was 1997, and the City of Oakland did sue the Raiders on that basis. Right now, Oakland has no stomach to file a lawsuit against the Raiders, preferring to handle the problem behind closed doors. But will the NFL allow a member club to act in what its host community believes is a less than good faith manner? The NFL Relocation Bylaws call for good faith bargaining - something Oakland Officials have told me the Raiders have not done to date. Stay tuned.
via IFTTT
http://youtu.be/QMg8-SEpHQA
Liked on YouTube: SNTIC Gives LVCC Expansion Priority Over Oakland Raiders Las Vegas NFL Stadium
SNTIC Gives LVCC Expansion Priority Over Oakland Raiders Las Vegas NFL Stadium - Video
SNTIC Gives LVCC Expansion Priority Over Oakland Raiders Las Vegas NFL Stadium Oakland Raiders Owner Mark Davis was treated like Moses who came from the promised land of the NFL to Las Vegas to bless the city and Clark County and Nevada with the promise of a pro football team - his own. He wowed the media at Nevada Governor Brian Sandoval's Southern Nevada Tourism And Infrastructure Commission when he spoke on April 28th. Many of the reports coming out of that meeting would have you believe the Raiders were already packing up and leaving Oakland for Las Vegas. Formalities like the $750 million hotel tax subsidy that Mark Davis, Majestic Reallty, and billionaire Sheldon Adelson's Las Vegas Sands Corp were asking for were completely ignored by all but the local newspaper reporter from the Las Vegas Daily Review - and that person works for Sheldon Adelson. Still, SNTIC website posts and reports contained clear warnings that Davis and Adelson were far from getting what they wanted. The media was so obsessed with what the NFL would do with Davis proposal, it forgot to even learn if a $1.4 billion stadium mostly paid for by hotel taxes was what Nevada and Las Vegas really wanted? One NFL media type even remarked on Twitter "We shall see this summer", even as I told him the fate of Davis proposal would be determined on May 26th, and not later. He, liked others, automatically assumed Davis proposal was going straight to the Nevada Legislature in a special session. The page for the Governor's commission's website provided warning: that, on May 26th 2016, the group would prioritize which project was most important to implement first. Well, a simple visit to the website now will reveal that answer: the expansion of The Las Vegas Convention Center. In letters larger than the rest, the desire to give the go-ahead for this much-need new phase is described like this: "Convention Center Legislature Recommendation". Then, below those words are these: "Stadium Proposal Follow-Up". In other words, the Commission has not even finished, let alone really fully started, analysis of Davis' proposal. Indeed, the consultant to the commission intended to have an analysis, but what was out on the website are two documents that are very damaging to Mark Davis' desire to have his team in Sin City. One document describes the percentage of public money that the Mark Davis proposal calls for, and compares that to other NFL Stadiums - the Davis proposal would result in the largest tax subsidy in NFL history. And that does not include the $200 million from tax increment financing - add that (and that is a conservative estimate) and the subsidy is almost at, if not over, $1 billion. The other document details the process of evaluating the 42 acre UNLV site that is next to two runways at McClarren International Airport - that calls for far more than height constraints and noise concerns. The whole of what needs to be looked at, alone, points to a process that could take four months to complete. And if that UNLV site is not used, then it's not as if other sites will not have their own issues that have to be worked out. Nevada is not going to hold up investing in the growth of its convention and tourism industry for the development of a football stadium, even if it's for the NFL. Mark Davis Has An Oakland Lease Problem The minutes from the April 28th meeting reveal another problem for Mark Davis: the lease the Oakland Raiders signed contains what the Coliseum Joint Powers Authority Executive Director Soctt McKibben has called "warrants" or markers to determine where both the team and the City of Oakland and Alameda County were in progress toward a new stadium at the Coliseum. Davis told the SNTIC that his intent was to play the Raiders in Oakland for the three year lease and then move to Las Vegas. The problem is that's not what the Coliseum JPA lease calls for. If the Raiders are in violation of the lease or about to be, is up to the NFL and the City of Oakland, but from this blogger's perspective, it certainly looks like Davis is close to being in that position. It's one thing to make a statement pointing to a possible violation, but on the other hand the last time the Raiders suggested they might break the Coliseum Master Lease agreement was 1997, and the City of Oakland did sue the Raiders on that basis. Right now, Oakland has no stomach to file a lawsuit against the Raiders, preferring to handle the problem behind closed doors. But will the NFL allow a member club to act in what its host community believes is a less than good faith manner? The NFL Relocation Bylaws call for good faith bargaining - something Oakland Officials have told me the Raiders have not done to date. Stay tuned.
via IFTTT
http://youtu.be/QMg8-SEpHQA
SNTIC Gives LVCC Expansion Priority Over Oakland Raiders Las Vegas NFL Stadium Oakland Raiders Owner Mark Davis was treated like Moses who came from the promised land of the NFL to Las Vegas to bless the city and Clark County and Nevada with the promise of a pro football team - his own. He wowed the media at Nevada Governor Brian Sandoval's Southern Nevada Tourism And Infrastructure Commission when he spoke on April 28th. Many of the reports coming out of that meeting would have you believe the Raiders were already packing up and leaving Oakland for Las Vegas. Formalities like the $750 million hotel tax subsidy that Mark Davis, Majestic Reallty, and billionaire Sheldon Adelson's Las Vegas Sands Corp were asking for were completely ignored by all but the local newspaper reporter from the Las Vegas Daily Review - and that person works for Sheldon Adelson. Still, SNTIC website posts and reports contained clear warnings that Davis and Adelson were far from getting what they wanted. The media was so obsessed with what the NFL would do with Davis proposal, it forgot to even learn if a $1.4 billion stadium mostly paid for by hotel taxes was what Nevada and Las Vegas really wanted? One NFL media type even remarked on Twitter "We shall see this summer", even as I told him the fate of Davis proposal would be determined on May 26th, and not later. He, liked others, automatically assumed Davis proposal was going straight to the Nevada Legislature in a special session. The page for the Governor's commission's website provided warning: that, on May 26th 2016, the group would prioritize which project was most important to implement first. Well, a simple visit to the website now will reveal that answer: the expansion of The Las Vegas Convention Center. In letters larger than the rest, the desire to give the go-ahead for this much-need new phase is described like this: "Convention Center Legislature Recommendation". Then, below those words are these: "Stadium Proposal Follow-Up". In other words, the Commission has not even finished, let alone really fully started, analysis of Davis' proposal. Indeed, the consultant to the commission intended to have an analysis, but what was out on the website are two documents that are very damaging to Mark Davis' desire to have his team in Sin City. One document describes the percentage of public money that the Mark Davis proposal calls for, and compares that to other NFL Stadiums - the Davis proposal would result in the largest tax subsidy in NFL history. And that does not include the $200 million from tax increment financing - add that (and that is a conservative estimate) and the subsidy is almost at, if not over, $1 billion. The other document details the process of evaluating the 42 acre UNLV site that is next to two runways at McClarren International Airport - that calls for far more than height constraints and noise concerns. The whole of what needs to be looked at, alone, points to a process that could take four months to complete. And if that UNLV site is not used, then it's not as if other sites will not have their own issues that have to be worked out. Nevada is not going to hold up investing in the growth of its convention and tourism industry for the development of a football stadium, even if it's for the NFL. Mark Davis Has An Oakland Lease Problem The minutes from the April 28th meeting reveal another problem for Mark Davis: the lease the Oakland Raiders signed contains what the Coliseum Joint Powers Authority Executive Director Soctt McKibben has called "warrants" or markers to determine where both the team and the City of Oakland and Alameda County were in progress toward a new stadium at the Coliseum. Davis told the SNTIC that his intent was to play the Raiders in Oakland for the three year lease and then move to Las Vegas. The problem is that's not what the Coliseum JPA lease calls for. If the Raiders are in violation of the lease or about to be, is up to the NFL and the City of Oakland, but from this blogger's perspective, it certainly looks like Davis is close to being in that position. It's one thing to make a statement pointing to a possible violation, but on the other hand the last time the Raiders suggested they might break the Coliseum Master Lease agreement was 1997, and the City of Oakland did sue the Raiders on that basis. Right now, Oakland has no stomach to file a lawsuit against the Raiders, preferring to handle the problem behind closed doors. But will the NFL allow a member club to act in what its host community believes is a less than good faith manner? The NFL Relocation Bylaws call for good faith bargaining - something Oakland Officials have told me the Raiders have not done to date. Stay tuned.
via IFTTT
http://youtu.be/QMg8-SEpHQA
Saturday, May 21, 2016
Liked on YouTube: Blake Lively Has LA Face Oakland Booty Not Racist; I Approve
Blake Lively Has LA Face Oakland Booty Not Racist; I Approve - Video
Racist Blake Lively proclaimed on Instagram that she had an LA face and an Oakland butt. Well, this Oaklander agrees and gives his seal of approval. What she wrote was not racist - and in this video, I explain why. Visit our blog Zennie62.com here: http://ift.tt/1d6iMwr
via IFTTT
http://youtu.be/tttfLiCzJ10
Racist Blake Lively proclaimed on Instagram that she had an LA face and an Oakland butt. Well, this Oaklander agrees and gives his seal of approval. What she wrote was not racist - and in this video, I explain why. Visit our blog Zennie62.com here: http://ift.tt/1d6iMwr
via IFTTT
http://youtu.be/tttfLiCzJ10
Blake Lively Has LA Face Oakland Booty Not Racist; I Approve
Blake Lively Has LA Face Oakland Booty Not Racist; I Approve - Video
Racist Blake Lively proclaimed on Instagram that she had an LA face and an Oakland butt. Well, this Oaklander agrees and gives his seal of approval. What she wrote was not racist - and in this video, I explain why. Visit our blog Zennie62.com here: http://ift.tt/1d6iMwr
via IFTTT
http://youtu.be/tttfLiCzJ10
Racist Blake Lively proclaimed on Instagram that she had an LA face and an Oakland butt. Well, this Oaklander agrees and gives his seal of approval. What she wrote was not racist - and in this video, I explain why. Visit our blog Zennie62.com here: http://ift.tt/1d6iMwr
via IFTTT
http://youtu.be/tttfLiCzJ10
Did Daniel Craig Quit James Bond - Idris Elba Or Tom Hiddleston Next?
Did Daniel Craig Quit James Bond - Idris Elba Or Tom Hiddleston Next? - Video
Did Daniel Craig Quit James Bond - Idris Elba Or Tom Hiddleston Next? Daniel Craig reportedly said he was done playing James Bond, even as the movie series producers offered a king's ransom for him to do just two more movies. If that is true, who should replace Mr. Craig? Idris Elba or Tom Hiddleston Visit our blog Zennie62.com here: http://ift.tt/1d6iMwr
via IFTTT
http://youtu.be/5w_xh-eO6EQ
Did Daniel Craig Quit James Bond - Idris Elba Or Tom Hiddleston Next? Daniel Craig reportedly said he was done playing James Bond, even as the movie series producers offered a king's ransom for him to do just two more movies. If that is true, who should replace Mr. Craig? Idris Elba or Tom Hiddleston Visit our blog Zennie62.com here: http://ift.tt/1d6iMwr
via IFTTT
http://youtu.be/5w_xh-eO6EQ
Liked on YouTube: Did Daniel Craig Quit James Bond - Idris Elba Or Tom Hiddleston Next?
Did Daniel Craig Quit James Bond - Idris Elba Or Tom Hiddleston Next? - Video
Did Daniel Craig Quit James Bond - Idris Elba Or Tom Hiddleston Next? Daniel Craig reportedly said he was done playing James Bond, even as the movie series producers offered a king's ransom for him to do just two more movies. If that is true, who should replace Mr. Craig? Idris Elba or Tom Hiddleston Visit our blog Zennie62.com here: http://ift.tt/1d6iMwr
via IFTTT
http://youtu.be/5w_xh-eO6EQ
Did Daniel Craig Quit James Bond - Idris Elba Or Tom Hiddleston Next? Daniel Craig reportedly said he was done playing James Bond, even as the movie series producers offered a king's ransom for him to do just two more movies. If that is true, who should replace Mr. Craig? Idris Elba or Tom Hiddleston Visit our blog Zennie62.com here: http://ift.tt/1d6iMwr
via IFTTT
http://youtu.be/5w_xh-eO6EQ
Friday, May 20, 2016
Liberals love science — unless it proves them wrong – New York Post
New York PostThe New York Times recently reported about A.J. Jackson’s travails in a Vermont high school. “There were practical issues,” Anemona Hartocollis writes. “When he had his period, he wondered if he should revert to the girls’ bathroom, because there was … and more …read more From:: New York City News By Google News
from WordPress http://ift.tt/1XGmnZT
via IFTTT
from WordPress http://ift.tt/1XGmnZT
via IFTTT
Instagram photographers document New York City – Fox5NY
Fox5NYNEW YORK (FOX5NY) – Just when you think you’ve seen all there is to see in New York, an Instagrammer comes along and blows your mind. Instagrammer Bill Bernal (@nycfotophun) is one of them has been capturing the city from his own unique vantage … …read more From:: New York City News By Google News
from WordPress http://ift.tt/20hGn3A
via IFTTT
from WordPress http://ift.tt/20hGn3A
via IFTTT
Among the Healers – New York Times
New York TimesCredit Daniel Borris for The New York Times. I see all the therapists I’ve faced off with: one who wore Lee Press-On Nails and fake eyelashes that made her look constantly astonished; another who hypothesized that I was a reincarnated Holocaust victim … …read more From:: New York City News By Google News
from WordPress http://ift.tt/1sIFFSK
via IFTTT
from WordPress http://ift.tt/1sIFFSK
via IFTTT
Middle East|Iraqi Protesters Clash With Troops in Baghdad’s Green Zone – New York Times
New York TimesThe crisis on Friday was a further demonstration of the rising anger among Iraqis toward a leadership class that is widely reviled, and presented a new challenge to the government of Prime Minister Haider al-Abadi at a time when Baghdad has faced a … and more …read more From:: New York City News […]
from WordPress http://ift.tt/1Rer6dq
via IFTTT
from WordPress http://ift.tt/1Rer6dq
via IFTTT
Dear Vegans And Nicole Arbour - My Vlog
Dear Vegans And Nicole Arbour - My Vlog - Video
This is my vlog response to YouTuber Nicole Arbour's vlog called "Dear Vegans". Oh. Visit Publix Market in Fayetteville, Georgia!
via IFTTT
http://youtu.be/0Ja66wdKOT0
This is my vlog response to YouTuber Nicole Arbour's vlog called "Dear Vegans". Oh. Visit Publix Market in Fayetteville, Georgia!
via IFTTT
http://youtu.be/0Ja66wdKOT0
Secret Service Shoots Man Near White House – New York Times
New York TimesThe White House and Treasury Department were on lockdown while the police investigated a shooting nearby. The president was away at the time. A man was shot by a Secret Service officer, the agency said on Twitter. By CBS, VIA REUTERS on Publish … and more …read more From:: New York City News […]
from WordPress http://ift.tt/240ryDG
via IFTTT
from WordPress http://ift.tt/240ryDG
via IFTTT
New York City FC host the Red Bulls in a rivalry fuelled by increasing disdain – The Guardian
The GuardianWhen fans of New York City’s two MLS clubs – New York City FC and the Red Bulls – congregate at Yankee Stadium on Saturday afternoon, there will be chanting, the hoisting of massive banners and a palpable air of disdain. What’s become known as the … and more …read more From:: New York […]
from WordPress http://ift.tt/27JlfJe
via IFTTT
from WordPress http://ift.tt/27JlfJe
via IFTTT
