Eli Manning Benched By NY Giants After 210 Consecutive Starts Is Disrespectful To NFL Legend - Video
Eli Manning Benched By NY Giants After 210 Consecutive Starts Is Disrespectful To NFL Legend
via IFTTT
https://youtu.be/ZKi1q8DNCbM
Tuesday, November 28, 2017
Eli Manning Benched By NY Giants After 210 Consecutive Starts Is Disrespectful To NFL Legend
Eli Manning Benched By NY Giants After 210 Consecutive Starts Is Disrespectful To NFL Legend - Video
Eli Manning Benched By NY Giants After 210 Consecutive Starts Is Disrespectful To NFL Legend
via IFTTT
https://youtu.be/ZKi1q8DNCbM
Eli Manning Benched By NY Giants After 210 Consecutive Starts Is Disrespectful To NFL Legend
via IFTTT
https://youtu.be/ZKi1q8DNCbM
Oakland Raiders And UNLV Still At Impasse In Las Vegas NFL Stadium Negotiations
Oakland Raiders And UNLV Still At Impasse In Las Vegas NFL Stadium Negotiations - Video
Oakland Raiders And UNLV Still At Impasse In Las Vegas NFL Stadium Negotiations The Oakland Raiders are still having problems in their stadium negotiations with the University of Nevada Las Vegas (UNLV). That much was clear in an obvious puff-piece that appeared Tuesday in the Sheldon Adeson-owned Las Vegas Review-Journal. While the intent was to send a message that all was well with the talks, the work actually had the opposite effect. Consider that the author cherry picked a quote from UNLV President Len Jessup, where the Prez said about the recent news of UNLV playing Cal “They literally want to be the first game in the stadium. We didn’t get those kinds of offers from Pac-12 schools for Sam Boyd Stadium. That’s a function of the new stadium.” Uh, let's not forget the UNLV vs Cal series will go on, new stadium or not. The rest of the article was a real nothing-burger. Here's why, and it can be summed up in this statement from Jessup: “Everybody’s busy. They’ve got so many other things they need to get done. And they’re in the middle of a season and they’re managing a team and renegotiating contracts. … I think it’s just that there’s a lot of work to be done here in a short amount of time. I really don’t want to say what specifically are the remaining items because I don’t think that would be fair to anybody involved in the negotiating on this thing at this point. I also have to say that once we’re done with this part of the process, we’re not done, because ultimately, it would then go to our regents. Thom (Reilly) has committed to the regents that that would be in a two-step fashion, one meeting where we would report out on everything and they would get to digest it and react to it, and then they’d get a little bit of time and then we’d come back in a second meeting with any revisions that are necessary to be able to vote on it.” Look, here's the fact: UNLV and the Oakland Raiders have been working on this Las Vegas Stadium Project since Mark Badain visited Jessup in late January of 2016, and behind the collective back of the City of Oakland and the County of Alameda – that's 670 days elapsed time, and counting! Come January 28th 2017, that will be two full years of talks. The problem is not hard to see for anyone who has experience in this area: UNLV is asking the thorny question of can the university afford a $1 million or more annual payment to the Oakland Raiders to use the stadium, considering the athletic department is running a deficit as this is written? Look at what Temple University is paying The Philadelphia Eagles to use Lincoln Financial at $1 million – which is the Raiders reported finanicial model for UNLV. Now, there's word the Eagles want to push that payment to $2 million – something UNLV is not equipped to afford. And UNLV has to be weighing that situation with the option of doing nothing with the Raiders, visting Nevada Governor Sandoval and asking to take over the stadium project (which UNLV can do according to the Southern Nevada Tourism and Investment Act), and needing to come up with only $200 million. (Something that any one of a number of UNLV backers, including Sheldon Adelson, would do.) It's a fair bet the Regents of UNLV know this. Stay tuned. PLEASE INVEST IN ZENNIE62MEDIA VIA PAYPALHERE: http://ift.tt/2u7j8De
via IFTTT
https://youtu.be/cS539bobM9s
Oakland Raiders And UNLV Still At Impasse In Las Vegas NFL Stadium Negotiations The Oakland Raiders are still having problems in their stadium negotiations with the University of Nevada Las Vegas (UNLV). That much was clear in an obvious puff-piece that appeared Tuesday in the Sheldon Adeson-owned Las Vegas Review-Journal. While the intent was to send a message that all was well with the talks, the work actually had the opposite effect. Consider that the author cherry picked a quote from UNLV President Len Jessup, where the Prez said about the recent news of UNLV playing Cal “They literally want to be the first game in the stadium. We didn’t get those kinds of offers from Pac-12 schools for Sam Boyd Stadium. That’s a function of the new stadium.” Uh, let's not forget the UNLV vs Cal series will go on, new stadium or not. The rest of the article was a real nothing-burger. Here's why, and it can be summed up in this statement from Jessup: “Everybody’s busy. They’ve got so many other things they need to get done. And they’re in the middle of a season and they’re managing a team and renegotiating contracts. … I think it’s just that there’s a lot of work to be done here in a short amount of time. I really don’t want to say what specifically are the remaining items because I don’t think that would be fair to anybody involved in the negotiating on this thing at this point. I also have to say that once we’re done with this part of the process, we’re not done, because ultimately, it would then go to our regents. Thom (Reilly) has committed to the regents that that would be in a two-step fashion, one meeting where we would report out on everything and they would get to digest it and react to it, and then they’d get a little bit of time and then we’d come back in a second meeting with any revisions that are necessary to be able to vote on it.” Look, here's the fact: UNLV and the Oakland Raiders have been working on this Las Vegas Stadium Project since Mark Badain visited Jessup in late January of 2016, and behind the collective back of the City of Oakland and the County of Alameda – that's 670 days elapsed time, and counting! Come January 28th 2017, that will be two full years of talks. The problem is not hard to see for anyone who has experience in this area: UNLV is asking the thorny question of can the university afford a $1 million or more annual payment to the Oakland Raiders to use the stadium, considering the athletic department is running a deficit as this is written? Look at what Temple University is paying The Philadelphia Eagles to use Lincoln Financial at $1 million – which is the Raiders reported finanicial model for UNLV. Now, there's word the Eagles want to push that payment to $2 million – something UNLV is not equipped to afford. And UNLV has to be weighing that situation with the option of doing nothing with the Raiders, visting Nevada Governor Sandoval and asking to take over the stadium project (which UNLV can do according to the Southern Nevada Tourism and Investment Act), and needing to come up with only $200 million. (Something that any one of a number of UNLV backers, including Sheldon Adelson, would do.) It's a fair bet the Regents of UNLV know this. Stay tuned. PLEASE INVEST IN ZENNIE62MEDIA VIA PAYPALHERE: http://ift.tt/2u7j8De
via IFTTT
https://youtu.be/cS539bobM9s
Oakland Raiders And UNLV Still At Impasse In Las Vegas NFL Stadium Negotiations
Oakland Raiders And UNLV Still At Impasse In Las Vegas NFL Stadium Negotiations - Video
Oakland Raiders And UNLV Still At Impasse In Las Vegas NFL Stadium Negotiations The Oakland Raiders are still having problems in their stadium negotiations with the University of Nevada Las Vegas (UNLV). That much was clear in an obvious puff-piece that appeared Tuesday in the Sheldon Adeson-owned Las Vegas Review-Journal. While the intent was to send a message that all was well with the talks, the work actually had the opposite effect. Consider that the author cherry picked a quote from UNLV President Len Jessup, where the Prez said about the recent news of UNLV playing Cal “They literally want to be the first game in the stadium. We didn’t get those kinds of offers from Pac-12 schools for Sam Boyd Stadium. That’s a function of the new stadium.” Uh, let's not forget the UNLV vs Cal series will go on, new stadium or not. The rest of the article was a real nothing-burger. Here's why, and it can be summed up in this statement from Jessup: “Everybody’s busy. They’ve got so many other things they need to get done. And they’re in the middle of a season and they’re managing a team and renegotiating contracts. … I think it’s just that there’s a lot of work to be done here in a short amount of time. I really don’t want to say what specifically are the remaining items because I don’t think that would be fair to anybody involved in the negotiating on this thing at this point. I also have to say that once we’re done with this part of the process, we’re not done, because ultimately, it would then go to our regents. Thom (Reilly) has committed to the regents that that would be in a two-step fashion, one meeting where we would report out on everything and they would get to digest it and react to it, and then they’d get a little bit of time and then we’d come back in a second meeting with any revisions that are necessary to be able to vote on it.” Look, here's the fact: UNLV and the Oakland Raiders have been working on this Las Vegas Stadium Project since Mark Badain visited Jessup in late January of 2016, and behind the collective back of the City of Oakland and the County of Alameda – that's 670 days elapsed time, and counting! Come January 28th 2017, that will be two full years of talks. The problem is not hard to see for anyone who has experience in this area: UNLV is asking the thorny question of can the university afford a $1 million or more annual payment to the Oakland Raiders to use the stadium, considering the athletic department is running a deficit as this is written? Look at what Temple University is paying The Philadelphia Eagles to use Lincoln Financial at $1 million – which is the Raiders reported finanicial model for UNLV. Now, there's word the Eagles want to push that payment to $2 million – something UNLV is not equipped to afford. And UNLV has to be weighing that situation with the option of doing nothing with the Raiders, visting Nevada Governor Sandoval and asking to take over the stadium project (which UNLV can do according to the Southern Nevada Tourism and Investment Act), and needing to come up with only $200 million. (Something that any one of a number of UNLV backers, including Sheldon Adelson, would do.) It's a fair bet the Regents of UNLV know this. Stay tuned. PLEASE INVEST IN ZENNIE62MEDIA VIA PAYPALHERE: http://ift.tt/2u7j8De
via IFTTT
https://youtu.be/cS539bobM9s
Oakland Raiders And UNLV Still At Impasse In Las Vegas NFL Stadium Negotiations The Oakland Raiders are still having problems in their stadium negotiations with the University of Nevada Las Vegas (UNLV). That much was clear in an obvious puff-piece that appeared Tuesday in the Sheldon Adeson-owned Las Vegas Review-Journal. While the intent was to send a message that all was well with the talks, the work actually had the opposite effect. Consider that the author cherry picked a quote from UNLV President Len Jessup, where the Prez said about the recent news of UNLV playing Cal “They literally want to be the first game in the stadium. We didn’t get those kinds of offers from Pac-12 schools for Sam Boyd Stadium. That’s a function of the new stadium.” Uh, let's not forget the UNLV vs Cal series will go on, new stadium or not. The rest of the article was a real nothing-burger. Here's why, and it can be summed up in this statement from Jessup: “Everybody’s busy. They’ve got so many other things they need to get done. And they’re in the middle of a season and they’re managing a team and renegotiating contracts. … I think it’s just that there’s a lot of work to be done here in a short amount of time. I really don’t want to say what specifically are the remaining items because I don’t think that would be fair to anybody involved in the negotiating on this thing at this point. I also have to say that once we’re done with this part of the process, we’re not done, because ultimately, it would then go to our regents. Thom (Reilly) has committed to the regents that that would be in a two-step fashion, one meeting where we would report out on everything and they would get to digest it and react to it, and then they’d get a little bit of time and then we’d come back in a second meeting with any revisions that are necessary to be able to vote on it.” Look, here's the fact: UNLV and the Oakland Raiders have been working on this Las Vegas Stadium Project since Mark Badain visited Jessup in late January of 2016, and behind the collective back of the City of Oakland and the County of Alameda – that's 670 days elapsed time, and counting! Come January 28th 2017, that will be two full years of talks. The problem is not hard to see for anyone who has experience in this area: UNLV is asking the thorny question of can the university afford a $1 million or more annual payment to the Oakland Raiders to use the stadium, considering the athletic department is running a deficit as this is written? Look at what Temple University is paying The Philadelphia Eagles to use Lincoln Financial at $1 million – which is the Raiders reported finanicial model for UNLV. Now, there's word the Eagles want to push that payment to $2 million – something UNLV is not equipped to afford. And UNLV has to be weighing that situation with the option of doing nothing with the Raiders, visting Nevada Governor Sandoval and asking to take over the stadium project (which UNLV can do according to the Southern Nevada Tourism and Investment Act), and needing to come up with only $200 million. (Something that any one of a number of UNLV backers, including Sheldon Adelson, would do.) It's a fair bet the Regents of UNLV know this. Stay tuned. PLEASE INVEST IN ZENNIE62MEDIA VIA PAYPALHERE: http://ift.tt/2u7j8De
via IFTTT
https://youtu.be/cS539bobM9s
Oakland Councilmember Annie Campbell Washington Pulls Tenant Relocation Ordinance At City Council
Oakland Councilmember Annie Campbell Washington Pulls Tenant Relocation Ordinance At City Council - Video
Oakland Councilmember Annie Campbell Washington Pulls Tenant Relocation Ordinance At City Council In Sneaky Way Oakland District 4 Vice Mayor And Councilmember Annie Campbell Washington just pulled from the Oakland City Council Agenda tonight an ordinance that, if passed, would have made any landlord seeking to remove tenants just to put in a family member or in-law have to pay a relocation cost to that tenant. Moreover, the act was done in a sneaky way: the Oakland City Council item that was the Tenant Relocation Ordinance had originally come from Councilmember Campbell Washington's own committee: the Life Enrichment Committee of which she is chairperson. Annie had time to make changes to it there, and before her own collegues. What she did, instead, was waited until the last minute and then pulled it without telling authors of the ordinance that she asked for changes to it. Well, author: Councilmember At-Large Rebecca Kaplan. The reason for the action was the Oakland Board of Realtors wrote a letter saying that the way the proposed law was written, it lacked a tenancy time period – they suggested three years in the letter to the City Council. Reached a moment ago, Councilmember Kaplan had this to say: “I continue to believe we must act to protect tenants in Oakland from displacement and I will keep working on these issues.” As a note, Annie Campbell Washington is running for reelection in 2018.
via IFTTT
https://youtu.be/67a5PggPgrk
Oakland Councilmember Annie Campbell Washington Pulls Tenant Relocation Ordinance At City Council In Sneaky Way Oakland District 4 Vice Mayor And Councilmember Annie Campbell Washington just pulled from the Oakland City Council Agenda tonight an ordinance that, if passed, would have made any landlord seeking to remove tenants just to put in a family member or in-law have to pay a relocation cost to that tenant. Moreover, the act was done in a sneaky way: the Oakland City Council item that was the Tenant Relocation Ordinance had originally come from Councilmember Campbell Washington's own committee: the Life Enrichment Committee of which she is chairperson. Annie had time to make changes to it there, and before her own collegues. What she did, instead, was waited until the last minute and then pulled it without telling authors of the ordinance that she asked for changes to it. Well, author: Councilmember At-Large Rebecca Kaplan. The reason for the action was the Oakland Board of Realtors wrote a letter saying that the way the proposed law was written, it lacked a tenancy time period – they suggested three years in the letter to the City Council. Reached a moment ago, Councilmember Kaplan had this to say: “I continue to believe we must act to protect tenants in Oakland from displacement and I will keep working on these issues.” As a note, Annie Campbell Washington is running for reelection in 2018.
via IFTTT
https://youtu.be/67a5PggPgrk
Oakland Councilmember Annie Campbell Washington Pulls Tenant Relocation Ordinance At City Council
Oakland Councilmember Annie Campbell Washington Pulls Tenant Relocation Ordinance At City Council - Video
Oakland Councilmember Annie Campbell Washington Pulls Tenant Relocation Ordinance At City Council In Sneaky Way Oakland District 4 Vice Mayor And Councilmember Annie Campbell Washington just pulled from the Oakland City Council Agenda tonight an ordinance that, if passed, would have made any landlord seeking to remove tenants just to put in a family member or in-law have to pay a relocation cost to that tenant. Moreover, the act was done in a sneaky way: the Oakland City Council item that was the Tenant Relocation Ordinance had originally come from Councilmember Campbell Washington's own committee: the Life Enrichment Committee of which she is chairperson. Annie had time to make changes to it there, and before her own collegues. What she did, instead, was waited until the last minute and then pulled it without telling authors of the ordinance that she asked for changes to it. Well, author: Councilmember At-Large Rebecca Kaplan. The reason for the action was the Oakland Board of Realtors wrote a letter saying that the way the proposed law was written, it lacked a tenancy time period – they suggested three years in the letter to the City Council. Reached a moment ago, Councilmember Kaplan had this to say: “I continue to believe we must act to protect tenants in Oakland from displacement and I will keep working on these issues.” As a note, Annie Campbell Washington is running for reelection in 2018.
via IFTTT
https://youtu.be/67a5PggPgrk
Oakland Councilmember Annie Campbell Washington Pulls Tenant Relocation Ordinance At City Council In Sneaky Way Oakland District 4 Vice Mayor And Councilmember Annie Campbell Washington just pulled from the Oakland City Council Agenda tonight an ordinance that, if passed, would have made any landlord seeking to remove tenants just to put in a family member or in-law have to pay a relocation cost to that tenant. Moreover, the act was done in a sneaky way: the Oakland City Council item that was the Tenant Relocation Ordinance had originally come from Councilmember Campbell Washington's own committee: the Life Enrichment Committee of which she is chairperson. Annie had time to make changes to it there, and before her own collegues. What she did, instead, was waited until the last minute and then pulled it without telling authors of the ordinance that she asked for changes to it. Well, author: Councilmember At-Large Rebecca Kaplan. The reason for the action was the Oakland Board of Realtors wrote a letter saying that the way the proposed law was written, it lacked a tenancy time period – they suggested three years in the letter to the City Council. Reached a moment ago, Councilmember Kaplan had this to say: “I continue to believe we must act to protect tenants in Oakland from displacement and I will keep working on these issues.” As a note, Annie Campbell Washington is running for reelection in 2018.
via IFTTT
https://youtu.be/67a5PggPgrk
Texas A&M Fires Kevin Sumlin At 7-5 For Jimbo Fisher At 5-6? That’s Racist
Texas A&M Fires Kevin Sumlin At 7-5 For Jimbo Fisher At 5-6? That’s Racist - Video
Texas A&M Fires Kevin Sumlin At 7-5 For Jimbo Fisher At 5-6? That’s Racist
via IFTTT
https://youtu.be/GanhStj5PCQ
Texas A&M Fires Kevin Sumlin At 7-5 For Jimbo Fisher At 5-6? That’s Racist
via IFTTT
https://youtu.be/GanhStj5PCQ
Texas A&M Fires Kevin Sumlin At 7-5 For Jimbo Fisher At 5-6? That’s Racist
Texas A&M Fires Kevin Sumlin At 7-5 For Jimbo Fisher At 5-6? That’s Racist - Video
Texas A&M Fires Kevin Sumlin At 7-5 For Jimbo Fisher At 5-6? That’s Racist
via IFTTT
https://youtu.be/GanhStj5PCQ
Texas A&M Fires Kevin Sumlin At 7-5 For Jimbo Fisher At 5-6? That’s Racist
via IFTTT
https://youtu.be/GanhStj5PCQ
City Of Oakland Doesn’t Control School District - Oakland City Charter Must Be Changed
City Of Oakland Doesn’t Control School District - Oakland City Charter Must Be Changed - Video
City Of Oakland Doesn’t Control School District - Oakland City Charter Must Be Changed
via IFTTT
https://youtu.be/o8hAkX_O_F4
City Of Oakland Doesn’t Control School District - Oakland City Charter Must Be Changed
via IFTTT
https://youtu.be/o8hAkX_O_F4
Olympic Doping Diaries: Chemist’s Notes Bolster Case Against Russia – New York Times
New York TimesHis contemporaneous notes, seen exclusively by The New York Times, speak to a key issue for Olympic officials: the state’s involvement in the massive sports fraud. In recent days, it has become clear that the International Olympic Committee is … and more …read more Source:: New York City News By Google News
from WordPress http://ift.tt/2Ah7FEx
via IFTTT
from WordPress http://ift.tt/2Ah7FEx
via IFTTT
City Of Oakland Doesn’t Control School District - Oakland City Charter Must Be Changed
City Of Oakland Doesn’t Control School District - Oakland City Charter Must Be Changed - Video
City Of Oakland Doesn’t Control School District - Oakland City Charter Must Be Changed
via IFTTT
https://youtu.be/o8hAkX_O_F4
City Of Oakland Doesn’t Control School District - Oakland City Charter Must Be Changed
via IFTTT
https://youtu.be/o8hAkX_O_F4
Oakland Unified School District Budget Cuts Could Be Averted Via Tax-Increment Financing
Oakland Unified School District Budget Cuts Could Be Averted Via Tax-Increment Financing - Video
Oakland Unified School District Budget Cuts Could Be Averted Via Tax-Increment Financing
via IFTTT
https://youtu.be/R7Nlx22UOK8
Oakland Unified School District Budget Cuts Could Be Averted Via Tax-Increment Financing
via IFTTT
https://youtu.be/R7Nlx22UOK8
Oakland Unified School District Budget Cuts Could Be Averted Via Tax-Increment Financing
Oakland Unified School District Budget Cuts Could Be Averted Via Tax-Increment Financing - Video
Oakland Unified School District Budget Cuts Could Be Averted Via Tax-Increment Financing
via IFTTT
https://youtu.be/R7Nlx22UOK8
Oakland Unified School District Budget Cuts Could Be Averted Via Tax-Increment Financing
via IFTTT
https://youtu.be/R7Nlx22UOK8
These Well-Known New Yorkers Give Back. Here’s Why. – New York Times
New York TimesAfter the post-Thanksgiving shopping days of Black Friday and Cyber Monday comes Giving Tuesday, which kicks off the season of charitable giving. As The New York Times continues its Neediest Cases Fund campaign, we reached out to some prominent … …read more Source:: New York City News By Google News
from WordPress http://ift.tt/2AGosBu
via IFTTT
from WordPress http://ift.tt/2AGosBu
via IFTTT
Mayor Of Puerto Rico Blasts Donald Trump On CNN
Mayor Of Puerto Rico Blasts Donald Trump On CNN - Video
Mayor Of Puerto Rico Blasts Donald Trump On CNN
via IFTTT
https://youtu.be/SUEBFgxN_MI
Mayor Of Puerto Rico Blasts Donald Trump On CNN
via IFTTT
https://youtu.be/SUEBFgxN_MI
Mayor Of Puerto Rico Blasts Donald Trump On CNN
Mayor Of Puerto Rico Blasts Donald Trump On CNN - Video
Mayor Of Puerto Rico Blasts Donald Trump On CNN
via IFTTT
https://youtu.be/SUEBFgxN_MI
Mayor Of Puerto Rico Blasts Donald Trump On CNN
via IFTTT
https://youtu.be/SUEBFgxN_MI
Meghan Markle, Glyphosate, Bali: Your Tuesday Briefing – New York Times
New York TimesThe international airport remains closed today. [The New York Times]. • Ireland could be headed for a snap election as Frances Fitzgerald, the deputy prime minister, faces a no-confidence vote for her part in an enduring dispute over a policing scandal. and more …read more Source:: New York City News By Google News
from WordPress http://ift.tt/2AEreqF
via IFTTT
from WordPress http://ift.tt/2AEreqF
via IFTTT
Meredith, a Midwestern staple, prepares to slash costs at New York’s Time Inc. – NBCNews.com
NBCNews.comMeredith Corporation, based in Des Moines, Iowa, and owner of home-oriented magazines like Better Homes and Gardens and Family Circle, is about to take over New York-based Time Inc. Let the culture clash begin, along with significant cost-cutting.Business Moguls Criticize Republican Tax Plans: DealBook BriefingNew York TimesMeredith to buy US publisher Time in Koch-backed dealReutersTIME […]
from WordPress http://ift.tt/2AdD0az
via IFTTT
from WordPress http://ift.tt/2AdD0az
via IFTTT
