Dan Schwartz Gets It! - Video
We need a Governor who will build schools, not waste taxpayer money on a $2 billion football stadium!
via IFTTT
https://youtu.be/HHx5AG9Sgok
Monday, April 16, 2018
Las Vegas Golden Knights Playoffs Tickets More Expensive Than Warriors Playoffs Tix
Las Vegas Golden Knights Playoffs Tickets More Expensive Than Warriors Playoffs Tix - Video
Las Vegas Golden Knights Playoffs Tickets More Expensive Than Warriors Playoffs Tix
via IFTTT
https://youtu.be/CdZnJfObZrs
Las Vegas Golden Knights Playoffs Tickets More Expensive Than Warriors Playoffs Tix
via IFTTT
https://youtu.be/CdZnJfObZrs
Pulitzer Prize for Public Service Goes to The New York Times and The New Yorker – New York Times
New York TimesThe New York Times and The New Yorker magazine won the Pulitzer Prize for public service on Monday for their reporting on sexual harassment that ushered in a reckoning about the treatment of women by powerful men in the uppermost ranks of Hollywood …New York Times, New Yorker Wins Pulitzer Prizes For Weinstein […]
from WordPress http://zennie62blog.com/2018/04/16/pulitzer-prize-for-public-service-goes-to-the-new-york-times-and-the-new-yorker-new-york-times/
via IFTTT
from WordPress http://zennie62blog.com/2018/04/16/pulitzer-prize-for-public-service-goes-to-the-new-york-times-and-the-new-yorker-new-york-times/
via IFTTT
Janes Harrison Retires From NFL, Sure 1st Ballot Hall Of Famer
Janes Harrison Retires From NFL, Sure 1st Ballot Hall Of Famer - Video
Janes Harrison Retires From NFL, Sure 1st Ballot Hall Of Famer
via IFTTT
https://youtu.be/tSvKc5haa1o
Janes Harrison Retires From NFL, Sure 1st Ballot Hall Of Famer
via IFTTT
https://youtu.be/tSvKc5haa1o
Oakland Raiders, Coliseum JPA Play Game Of Chicken In Stadium Lease Extension Talks
Oakland Raiders, Coliseum JPA Play Game Of Chicken In Stadium Lease Extension Talks - Video
Oakland Raiders, Coliseum JPA Play Game Of Chicken In Stadium Lease Extension Talks The game of chicken goes something like this: “two drivers drive towards each other on a collision course: one must swerve, or both may die in a crash, but if one driver swerves and the other does not, the one who swerved will be called a "chicken", meaning that person's a coward.” In the case of the Oakland Raiders, and the Oakland Coliseum Joint Powers Authority, they are the two drivers headed toward each other. The “ collision course” is the sizable rent increase that's at the center of the Coliseum JPA proposal. The Raiders, by taking a month to say whether or not they will accept the Coliseum JPA lease extension, are playing with the idea that the stadium owner will eventually cave in and give the NFL team a lower rent. But my sources say that's not happening. “The deal is the deal,” as I was told, today. I was also informed that the Raiders are still interested in staying in Oakland and playing at the Coliseum until their new money-pit of a sports complex is ready to be used in Las Vegas. So, with that in mind, Marc Badain wants the JPA to give an alternative proposal, but he's not going to get one. The Coliseum JPA, on the other hand as of now, left the door open for the Raiders to come up with an “innovative and creative” counter-offer – so far, the Raiders have done nothing. At some point, the two sides have to decide what to do. The Coliseum JPA does not want to give in to the Oakland Raiders because there's still very hard feelings over the way the Raiders manipluated them in going behind their collective back to do a stadium deal, first for Carson, then for Las Vegas. And then there's the million dollars in parking revenue not paid to the Coliseum JPA, and that issue's not been resolved either (to this date). The Raiders being, well, the Oakland Raiders, are trying to pay as little as possible to the Coliseum JPA, while sticking around the facility. The way I see it, the Raiders agreed to give Jon Gruden a 10-year, $100 million contract, and have floated the idea of a giant, guaranteed money deal for Khalil Mack. Why not give something to the Coliseum JPA, out the door to Las Vegas? Seems to be an OK request to me. The Oakland Raiders have until the end of June to work all of this out, unless the Coliseum JPA decides to move up the drop-dead-date at the April 20th meeting. That would be akin to moving the goal posts, but the Coliseum JPA's as mad at the Raiders as a mad hatter. The board is in no mood to mess around – if the Raiders leave after 2018, the Coliseum JPA believes they can weather the void of events for what would be the 2019 NFL Season. “They save over $1 million by the Raiders being gone,” a source said,”and while some jobs will be gone from the Raiders departure, that can be made up.” So, we now know the Raiders, at least for this week, are into staying in Oakland for as long as possible. My read is the team isn't rich enough to fashion an affordable, alternative place to play in a short period of time. So, say goodbye to Sam Boyd Stadium as the new temporary home. Not happening. (It's really not suited for NFL Foorball without a $50 million upgrade – at least). In my view, here's what the Raiders should do: take the million in parking money they owe, and use that to make an expanded West Side Club. The problem with the club now is not enough places to buy food to complement the bar space. Spend the million to build a kind of mini-food-court and also push that wall out to the patio area in the process, bringing that outdoor space, indoors. Then the Raiders could argue they spent money to help make money for the Coliseum JPA and its tenants, then ask for a million reduction in the rent offer, and be good to go. There, problem solved. But then the Raiders never listen to me; would be good for them to change. Given my call with the stadium plan Davis asked for, my year-old-plus assertion that the Clark County hotel stadium tax was too small, and my report that Las Vegas has a visitor rate problem, I'm three-for-three – the prospects of me making it four-for-four look pretty good. Stay tuned. PLEASE INVEST IN ZENNIE62MEDIA VIA PAYPALHERE: https://ift.tt/2u7j8De
via IFTTT
https://youtu.be/Ist9PQ_uEm8
Oakland Raiders, Coliseum JPA Play Game Of Chicken In Stadium Lease Extension Talks The game of chicken goes something like this: “two drivers drive towards each other on a collision course: one must swerve, or both may die in a crash, but if one driver swerves and the other does not, the one who swerved will be called a "chicken", meaning that person's a coward.” In the case of the Oakland Raiders, and the Oakland Coliseum Joint Powers Authority, they are the two drivers headed toward each other. The “ collision course” is the sizable rent increase that's at the center of the Coliseum JPA proposal. The Raiders, by taking a month to say whether or not they will accept the Coliseum JPA lease extension, are playing with the idea that the stadium owner will eventually cave in and give the NFL team a lower rent. But my sources say that's not happening. “The deal is the deal,” as I was told, today. I was also informed that the Raiders are still interested in staying in Oakland and playing at the Coliseum until their new money-pit of a sports complex is ready to be used in Las Vegas. So, with that in mind, Marc Badain wants the JPA to give an alternative proposal, but he's not going to get one. The Coliseum JPA, on the other hand as of now, left the door open for the Raiders to come up with an “innovative and creative” counter-offer – so far, the Raiders have done nothing. At some point, the two sides have to decide what to do. The Coliseum JPA does not want to give in to the Oakland Raiders because there's still very hard feelings over the way the Raiders manipluated them in going behind their collective back to do a stadium deal, first for Carson, then for Las Vegas. And then there's the million dollars in parking revenue not paid to the Coliseum JPA, and that issue's not been resolved either (to this date). The Raiders being, well, the Oakland Raiders, are trying to pay as little as possible to the Coliseum JPA, while sticking around the facility. The way I see it, the Raiders agreed to give Jon Gruden a 10-year, $100 million contract, and have floated the idea of a giant, guaranteed money deal for Khalil Mack. Why not give something to the Coliseum JPA, out the door to Las Vegas? Seems to be an OK request to me. The Oakland Raiders have until the end of June to work all of this out, unless the Coliseum JPA decides to move up the drop-dead-date at the April 20th meeting. That would be akin to moving the goal posts, but the Coliseum JPA's as mad at the Raiders as a mad hatter. The board is in no mood to mess around – if the Raiders leave after 2018, the Coliseum JPA believes they can weather the void of events for what would be the 2019 NFL Season. “They save over $1 million by the Raiders being gone,” a source said,”and while some jobs will be gone from the Raiders departure, that can be made up.” So, we now know the Raiders, at least for this week, are into staying in Oakland for as long as possible. My read is the team isn't rich enough to fashion an affordable, alternative place to play in a short period of time. So, say goodbye to Sam Boyd Stadium as the new temporary home. Not happening. (It's really not suited for NFL Foorball without a $50 million upgrade – at least). In my view, here's what the Raiders should do: take the million in parking money they owe, and use that to make an expanded West Side Club. The problem with the club now is not enough places to buy food to complement the bar space. Spend the million to build a kind of mini-food-court and also push that wall out to the patio area in the process, bringing that outdoor space, indoors. Then the Raiders could argue they spent money to help make money for the Coliseum JPA and its tenants, then ask for a million reduction in the rent offer, and be good to go. There, problem solved. But then the Raiders never listen to me; would be good for them to change. Given my call with the stadium plan Davis asked for, my year-old-plus assertion that the Clark County hotel stadium tax was too small, and my report that Las Vegas has a visitor rate problem, I'm three-for-three – the prospects of me making it four-for-four look pretty good. Stay tuned. PLEASE INVEST IN ZENNIE62MEDIA VIA PAYPALHERE: https://ift.tt/2u7j8De
via IFTTT
https://youtu.be/Ist9PQ_uEm8
Oakland Raiders, Coliseum JPA Play Game Of Chicken In Stadium Lease Extension Talks
Oakland Raiders, Coliseum JPA Play Game Of Chicken In Stadium Lease Extension Talks - Video
Oakland Raiders, Coliseum JPA Play Game Of Chicken In Stadium Lease Extension Talks The game of chicken goes something like this: “two drivers drive towards each other on a collision course: one must swerve, or both may die in a crash, but if one driver swerves and the other does not, the one who swerved will be called a "chicken", meaning that person's a coward.” In the case of the Oakland Raiders, and the Oakland Coliseum Joint Powers Authority, they are the two drivers headed toward each other. The “ collision course” is the sizable rent increase that's at the center of the Coliseum JPA proposal. The Raiders, by taking a month to say whether or not they will accept the Coliseum JPA lease extension, are playing with the idea that the stadium owner will eventually cave in and give the NFL team a lower rent. But my sources say that's not happening. “The deal is the deal,” as I was told, today. I was also informed that the Raiders are still interested in staying in Oakland and playing at the Coliseum until their new money-pit of a sports complex is ready to be used in Las Vegas. So, with that in mind, Marc Badain wants the JPA to give an alternative proposal, but he's not going to get one. The Coliseum JPA, on the other hand as of now, left the door open for the Raiders to come up with an “innovative and creative” counter-offer – so far, the Raiders have done nothing. At some point, the two sides have to decide what to do. The Coliseum JPA does not want to give in to the Oakland Raiders because there's still very hard feelings over the way the Raiders manipluated them in going behind their collective back to do a stadium deal, first for Carson, then for Las Vegas. And then there's the million dollars in parking revenue not paid to the Coliseum JPA, and that issue's not been resolved either (to this date). The Raiders being, well, the Oakland Raiders, are trying to pay as little as possible to the Coliseum JPA, while sticking around the facility. The way I see it, the Raiders agreed to give Jon Gruden a 10-year, $100 million contract, and have floated the idea of a giant, guaranteed money deal for Khalil Mack. Why not give something to the Coliseum JPA, out the door to Las Vegas? Seems to be an OK request to me. The Oakland Raiders have until the end of June to work all of this out, unless the Coliseum JPA decides to move up the drop-dead-date at the April 20th meeting. That would be akin to moving the goal posts, but the Coliseum JPA's as mad at the Raiders as a mad hatter. The board is in no mood to mess around – if the Raiders leave after 2018, the Coliseum JPA believes they can weather the void of events for what would be the 2019 NFL Season. “They save over $1 million by the Raiders being gone,” a source said,”and while some jobs will be gone from the Raiders departure, that can be made up.” So, we now know the Raiders, at least for this week, are into staying in Oakland for as long as possible. My read is the team isn't rich enough to fashion an affordable, alternative place to play in a short period of time. So, say goodbye to Sam Boyd Stadium as the new temporary home. Not happening. (It's really not suited for NFL Foorball without a $50 million upgrade – at least). In my view, here's what the Raiders should do: take the million in parking money they owe, and use that to make an expanded West Side Club. The problem with the club now is not enough places to buy food to complement the bar space. Spend the million to build a kind of mini-food-court and also push that wall out to the patio area in the process, bringing that outdoor space, indoors. Then the Raiders could argue they spent money to help make money for the Coliseum JPA and its tenants, then ask for a million reduction in the rent offer, and be good to go. There, problem solved. But then the Raiders never listen to me; would be good for them to change. Given my call with the stadium plan Davis asked for, my year-old-plus assertion that the Clark County hotel stadium tax was too small, and my report that Las Vegas has a visitor rate problem, I'm three-for-three – the prospects of me making it four-for-four look pretty good. Stay tuned. PLEASE INVEST IN ZENNIE62MEDIA VIA PAYPALHERE: https://ift.tt/2u7j8De
via IFTTT
https://youtu.be/Ist9PQ_uEm8
Oakland Raiders, Coliseum JPA Play Game Of Chicken In Stadium Lease Extension Talks The game of chicken goes something like this: “two drivers drive towards each other on a collision course: one must swerve, or both may die in a crash, but if one driver swerves and the other does not, the one who swerved will be called a "chicken", meaning that person's a coward.” In the case of the Oakland Raiders, and the Oakland Coliseum Joint Powers Authority, they are the two drivers headed toward each other. The “ collision course” is the sizable rent increase that's at the center of the Coliseum JPA proposal. The Raiders, by taking a month to say whether or not they will accept the Coliseum JPA lease extension, are playing with the idea that the stadium owner will eventually cave in and give the NFL team a lower rent. But my sources say that's not happening. “The deal is the deal,” as I was told, today. I was also informed that the Raiders are still interested in staying in Oakland and playing at the Coliseum until their new money-pit of a sports complex is ready to be used in Las Vegas. So, with that in mind, Marc Badain wants the JPA to give an alternative proposal, but he's not going to get one. The Coliseum JPA, on the other hand as of now, left the door open for the Raiders to come up with an “innovative and creative” counter-offer – so far, the Raiders have done nothing. At some point, the two sides have to decide what to do. The Coliseum JPA does not want to give in to the Oakland Raiders because there's still very hard feelings over the way the Raiders manipluated them in going behind their collective back to do a stadium deal, first for Carson, then for Las Vegas. And then there's the million dollars in parking revenue not paid to the Coliseum JPA, and that issue's not been resolved either (to this date). The Raiders being, well, the Oakland Raiders, are trying to pay as little as possible to the Coliseum JPA, while sticking around the facility. The way I see it, the Raiders agreed to give Jon Gruden a 10-year, $100 million contract, and have floated the idea of a giant, guaranteed money deal for Khalil Mack. Why not give something to the Coliseum JPA, out the door to Las Vegas? Seems to be an OK request to me. The Oakland Raiders have until the end of June to work all of this out, unless the Coliseum JPA decides to move up the drop-dead-date at the April 20th meeting. That would be akin to moving the goal posts, but the Coliseum JPA's as mad at the Raiders as a mad hatter. The board is in no mood to mess around – if the Raiders leave after 2018, the Coliseum JPA believes they can weather the void of events for what would be the 2019 NFL Season. “They save over $1 million by the Raiders being gone,” a source said,”and while some jobs will be gone from the Raiders departure, that can be made up.” So, we now know the Raiders, at least for this week, are into staying in Oakland for as long as possible. My read is the team isn't rich enough to fashion an affordable, alternative place to play in a short period of time. So, say goodbye to Sam Boyd Stadium as the new temporary home. Not happening. (It's really not suited for NFL Foorball without a $50 million upgrade – at least). In my view, here's what the Raiders should do: take the million in parking money they owe, and use that to make an expanded West Side Club. The problem with the club now is not enough places to buy food to complement the bar space. Spend the million to build a kind of mini-food-court and also push that wall out to the patio area in the process, bringing that outdoor space, indoors. Then the Raiders could argue they spent money to help make money for the Coliseum JPA and its tenants, then ask for a million reduction in the rent offer, and be good to go. There, problem solved. But then the Raiders never listen to me; would be good for them to change. Given my call with the stadium plan Davis asked for, my year-old-plus assertion that the Clark County hotel stadium tax was too small, and my report that Las Vegas has a visitor rate problem, I'm three-for-three – the prospects of me making it four-for-four look pretty good. Stay tuned. PLEASE INVEST IN ZENNIE62MEDIA VIA PAYPALHERE: https://ift.tt/2u7j8De
via IFTTT
https://youtu.be/Ist9PQ_uEm8
Lung Cancer Patients Live Longer With Immune Therapy – New York Times
New York Times“What it suggests is that chemotherapy alone is no longer a standard of care,” said Dr. Leena Gandhi, a leader of the study and director of the Thoracic Medical Oncology Program at the Perlmutter Cancer Center at New York University Langone Health. The … and more …read more Source:: New York City News […]
from WordPress http://zennie62blog.com/2018/04/16/lung-cancer-patients-live-longer-with-immune-therapy-new-york-times/
via IFTTT
from WordPress http://zennie62blog.com/2018/04/16/lung-cancer-patients-live-longer-with-immune-therapy-new-york-times/
via IFTTT
7 Inmates Killed in South Carolina Prison Riot – New York Times
New York TimesSeven inmates were killed and 17 others were injured in a large riot that broke out Sunday night at a maximum-security prison in South Carolina, the authorities said. The fights started around 7:15 p.m. in three housing units at Lee Correctional … and more …read more Source:: New York City News By Google […]
from WordPress http://zennie62blog.com/2018/04/16/7-inmates-killed-in-south-carolina-prison-riot-new-york-times/
via IFTTT
from WordPress http://zennie62blog.com/2018/04/16/7-inmates-killed-in-south-carolina-prison-riot-new-york-times/
via IFTTT
Monday April 16th Zennie62 Morning Vlog On James Comey And Donald Trump
Monday April 16th Zennie62 Morning Vlog On James Comey And Donald Trump - Video
Monday April 16th Zennie62 Morning Vlog On James Comey And Donald Trump
via IFTTT
https://youtu.be/Sx-klBmGZ5A
Monday April 16th Zennie62 Morning Vlog On James Comey And Donald Trump
via IFTTT
https://youtu.be/Sx-klBmGZ5A
Inside New York’s silent sex trafficking epidemic – New York Post
New York PostInside a handsome brick building on a tree-lined street near Brooklyn’s Prospect Park, lay one of the city’s dirtiest secrets. As people strolled past the Prospect Heights home on their way to the park, the Brooklyn Museum or a bar where celebrated … and more …read more Source:: New York City News By […]
from WordPress http://zennie62blog.com/2018/04/16/inside-new-yorks-silent-sex-trafficking-epidemic-new-york-post/
via IFTTT
from WordPress http://zennie62blog.com/2018/04/16/inside-new-yorks-silent-sex-trafficking-epidemic-new-york-post/
via IFTTT
Great Talk With Friends Of CCIG Tiger Rugby During Las Vegas Sevens
Great Talk With Friends Of CCIG Tiger Rugby During Las Vegas Sevens - Video
Great Talk With Friends Of CCIG Tiger Rugby During Las Vegas Sevens
via IFTTT
https://youtu.be/0G6O8ejTFKI
Great Talk With Friends Of CCIG Tiger Rugby During Las Vegas Sevens
via IFTTT
https://youtu.be/0G6O8ejTFKI
Great Talk With Friends Of CCIG Tiger Rugby During Las Vegas Sevens
Great Talk With Friends Of CCIG Tiger Rugby During Las Vegas Sevens - Video
Great Talk With Friends Of CCIG Tiger Rugby During Las Vegas Sevens
via IFTTT
https://youtu.be/0G6O8ejTFKI
Great Talk With Friends Of CCIG Tiger Rugby During Las Vegas Sevens
via IFTTT
https://youtu.be/0G6O8ejTFKI
New York Times editorial: Trump ‘is not above the law’ – CNNMoney
CNNMoneyWith an unusually long editorial in Monday’s newspaper, The New York Times is making a forceful statement: “The president is not above the law.” The 1,366-word article warns that President Donald Trump “may act to cripple or shut down an investigation … and more …read more Source:: New York City News By Google News
from WordPress http://zennie62blog.com/2018/04/15/new-york-times-editorial-trump-is-not-above-the-law-cnnmoney/
via IFTTT
from WordPress http://zennie62blog.com/2018/04/15/new-york-times-editorial-trump-is-not-above-the-law-cnnmoney/
via IFTTT
Hibiscus Tea Combats High Blood Pressure, Puts You To Sleep, Too
Hibiscus Tea Combats High Blood Pressure, Puts You To Sleep, Too - Video
Hibiscus Tea Combats High Blood Pressure, Puts You To Sleep, Too
via IFTTT
https://youtu.be/-vOorCM7fjE
Hibiscus Tea Combats High Blood Pressure, Puts You To Sleep, Too
via IFTTT
https://youtu.be/-vOorCM7fjE
Hibiscus Tea Combats High Blood Pressure, Puts You To Sleep, Too
Hibiscus Tea Combats High Blood Pressure, Puts You To Sleep, Too - Video
Hibiscus Tea Combats High Blood Pressure, Puts You To Sleep, Too
via IFTTT
https://youtu.be/-vOorCM7fjE
Hibiscus Tea Combats High Blood Pressure, Puts You To Sleep, Too
via IFTTT
https://youtu.be/-vOorCM7fjE
Oakland News Now - Visit Oakland’s Newest News Blog OaklandNewsNow.com
Oakland News Now - Visit Oakland’s Newest News Blog OaklandNewsNow.com - Video
Oakland News Now - Visit Oakland’s Newest News Blog OaklandNewsNow.com
via IFTTT
https://youtu.be/vPlHP9qJtY0
Oakland News Now - Visit Oakland’s Newest News Blog OaklandNewsNow.com
via IFTTT
https://youtu.be/vPlHP9qJtY0
Oakland News Now - Visit Oakland’s Newest News Blog OaklandNewsNow.com
Oakland News Now - Visit Oakland’s Newest News Blog OaklandNewsNow.com - Video
Oakland News Now - Visit Oakland’s Newest News Blog OaklandNewsNow.com
via IFTTT
https://youtu.be/vPlHP9qJtY0
Oakland News Now - Visit Oakland’s Newest News Blog OaklandNewsNow.com
via IFTTT
https://youtu.be/vPlHP9qJtY0
Would You Believe Gwen Stefani Is 48 Years Old?
Would You Believe Gwen Stefani Is 48 Years Old? - Video
Gwen Stefani age? Would You Believe Gwen Stefani Is 48 Years Old?
via IFTTT
https://youtu.be/EaUnPxC7gWc
Gwen Stefani age? Would You Believe Gwen Stefani Is 48 Years Old?
via IFTTT
https://youtu.be/EaUnPxC7gWc
Would You Believe Gwen Stefani Is 48 Years Old?
Would You Believe Gwen Stefani Is 48 Years Old? - Video
Gwen Stefani age? Would You Believe Gwen Stefani Is 48 Years Old?
via IFTTT
https://youtu.be/EaUnPxC7gWc
Gwen Stefani age? Would You Believe Gwen Stefani Is 48 Years Old?
via IFTTT
https://youtu.be/EaUnPxC7gWc
