Jerry Jones Takes A Knee With Dallas Cowboys Players, Oakland Raiders Las Vegas News - Video
Jerry Jones Takes A Knee With Dallas Cowboys Players, Oakland Raiders Las Vegas News PLEASE INVEST IN ZENNIE62MEDIA VIA PAYPALHERE: http://ift.tt/2u7j8De
via IFTTT
https://youtu.be/YT3pOQp-1a4
Monday, September 25, 2017
Jerry Jones Takes A Knee With Dallas Cowboys Players, Oakland Raiders Las Vegas News
Jerry Jones Takes A Knee With Dallas Cowboys Players, Oakland Raiders Las Vegas News - Video
Jerry Jones Takes A Knee With Dallas Cowboys Players, Oakland Raiders Las Vegas News PLEASE INVEST IN ZENNIE62MEDIA VIA PAYPALHERE: http://ift.tt/2u7j8De
via IFTTT
https://youtu.be/YT3pOQp-1a4
Jerry Jones Takes A Knee With Dallas Cowboys Players, Oakland Raiders Las Vegas News PLEASE INVEST IN ZENNIE62MEDIA VIA PAYPALHERE: http://ift.tt/2u7j8De
via IFTTT
https://youtu.be/YT3pOQp-1a4
Health Bill Appears Dead as Pivotal GOP Senator Declares Opposition – New York Times
New York TimesCredit Tom Brenner/The New York Times. WASHINGTON — Senator Susan Collins of Maine said on Monday that she would oppose the latest plan to repeal and replace the Affordable Care Act, leaving Republican leaders clearly short of the votes they need …The GOP’s Two-Pronged Strategy to Pass Health Care: Deceit and Reckless SpeedNew […]
from WordPress http://ift.tt/2xxLAxE
via IFTTT
from WordPress http://ift.tt/2xxLAxE
via IFTTT
After London Bans Uber, New York Weighs Limits to Help Cabbies – Bloomberg
Bloomberg“If the competition continues to insist on playing by a different set of rules, then New York should simply follow London and tell Uber to hit the road,” said Richard Lipsky, a spokesman for the Taxi Medallion Owners and Drivers Association, an … and more …read more Source:: New York City News By Google News
from WordPress http://ift.tt/2xx9WYe
via IFTTT
from WordPress http://ift.tt/2xx9WYe
via IFTTT
Jerry Jones Takes A Knee Dallas Cowboys Owner With His Players
Jerry Jones Takes A Knee Dallas Cowboys Owner With His Players - Video
Jerry Jones Takes A Knee Dallas Cowboys Owner With His Players
via IFTTT
https://youtu.be/1ZXzevIc0WA
Jerry Jones Takes A Knee Dallas Cowboys Owner With His Players
via IFTTT
https://youtu.be/1ZXzevIc0WA
A Divider, Not a Uniter, Trump Widens the Breach – New York Times
New York TimesPresident Trump boarding Air Force One at Morristown Municipal Airport in New Jersey on his way back to the White House on Sunday. Credit Tom Brenner/The New York Times. WASHINGTON — Over the course of just 17 hours this weekend, President … and more …read more Source:: New York City News By Google […]
from WordPress http://ift.tt/2xBL978
via IFTTT
from WordPress http://ift.tt/2xBL978
via IFTTT
A Rabbi, an Imam and a Message of Inclusion at a Muslim Parade – New York Times
New York TimesJust down the street, selling Bangladeshi, Yemeni, Saudi Arabian and American flags along the parade route, Al Knight, from Brooklyn, was stunned by the choice of grand marshal. “The world looks at New York — we are the capital of the world,” he said. and more …read more Source:: New York City News […]
from WordPress http://ift.tt/2wSqB6o
via IFTTT
from WordPress http://ift.tt/2wSqB6o
via IFTTT
Steelers confused about teammate’s public anthem salute – New York Post
New York PostAs Alejandro Villanueva gets praised from the outside for making a concerted effort to salute the American flag, it sounds as if his own locker room is not doing as much saluting. The Steelers offensive tackle stepping out onto the sidelines to put his … and more …read more Source:: New York City […]
from WordPress http://ift.tt/2y41cM7
via IFTTT
from WordPress http://ift.tt/2y41cM7
via IFTTT
Anthony Weiner gets hard time – New York Post
New York PostHe will have to surrender to his designated facility by Nov. 6 — his lawyer put in a request for Schuylkill Federal Correctional Facilit in Pennsylvania, or another low-security prison near New York. Weiner, 53, had faced as much as 10 years in the …Anthony Weiner to Be Sentenced Today in Sexting ScandalNew […]
from WordPress http://ift.tt/2y3neip
via IFTTT
from WordPress http://ift.tt/2y3neip
via IFTTT
New York Today: Why Do We Yawn? – New York Times
New York TimesA couple of New York City doctors told us that nobody quite knows. Yawning is an ancient evolutionary behavior, but it’s unclear why we do it, according to Dr. Orrin Devinsky, a professor in the departments of neurology, neurosurgery and psychiatry at … …read more Source:: New York City News By Google News
from WordPress http://ift.tt/2fM51uZ
via IFTTT
from WordPress http://ift.tt/2fM51uZ
via IFTTT
Fueled by Trump’s Tweets, Anthem Protests Grow to a Nationwide Rebuke – New York Times
New York TimesGreen Bay Packers quarterback Aaron Rodgers posted a photograph of himself kneeling with three of his teammates during warm-ups before the game, and New England Patriots quarterback Tom Brady, a supporter of the president, “liked” Rodgers’s photo.Dolphins players make their own Colin Kaepernick statementNew York PostNFL players in games across US kneel during […]
from WordPress http://ift.tt/2xspZci
via IFTTT
from WordPress http://ift.tt/2xspZci
via IFTTT
New Knicks piece wants to prove he overcame biggest weakness – New York Post
New York PostNew Knicks center Enes Kanter spent a lot of time in New York this summer, working out, losing weight and appearing on a couple of occasions with Russell Westbrook at Carmelo Anthony’s pickup games at his Manhattan gym. According to Kanter’s manager …Where do Knicks go from here? A post-Melo landscapeESPNNew York Knicks […]
from WordPress http://ift.tt/2jX3JBR
via IFTTT
from WordPress http://ift.tt/2jX3JBR
via IFTTT
Is Oakland Special Event Permit Redesign Task Force Protecting Next Warehouse Fire Location?
Is Oakland Special Event Permit Redesign Task Force Protecting Next Warehouse Fire Location? - Video
In the wake of the tragic Oakland Ghost Ship Warehouse Fire that took 36 lives on December 2, 2016, The City of Oakland has still not taken any meaningful action to make sure that such an event does not occur again, save for one policy change: allowing Oakland Police Officers to tell the City about unpermitted events. This effort is also part of a survey that's under way and established by an inner-City-of-Oakland group called the Special Event Permit Redesign Task Force. Don't worry if you've not been informed about it as an Oakland resident; only City of Oakland staffers sit on it, and that's a bad idea. The Special Event Permit Redesign Task Force includes "Greg Minor and Nancy Marcus in the City's Administrator's Office, Kelley Kahn in the Mayor's Office, Jim MacIlvaine in the Cultural Affairs Office, Sgt. Andy McNeil in the Oakland Police Department, Assistant Fire Marshall Cesar Avila in the Oakland Fire Department, Tim Low in Building Services and Aubrey Rose in the Planning Department, (and) has identified several barriers that discourage compliance, as well as strategies to combat these obstacles." But on the survey page the task force does not explain what those "several barriers that discourage compliance, as well as strategies to combat these obstacles" are. The problem is what we in planning used to call "Analysis Paralysis" - or "the state of over-analyzing (or over-thinking) a situation so that a decision or action is never taken, in effect paralyzing the outcome." For example, the survey has been in existence for several months now, and no release of information from it has happened. Moreover, the survey itself lacks a way to determine the location of any venue that may be the focus of the response. There's a reason for this, if wrongheaded. Greg Minor, in The City's Administrator's Office, said in an email to me that... "The special event permit redesign survey did not include a question regarding the specific venue(s) associated with the survey respondents in order to protect the anonymity of the survey respondents, many of whom have expressed concern about either being displaced from their place of residence/assembly or having the venue shut down. In turn, this anonymity should maximize the amount of information the City receives from those currently holding unpermitted events. In terms of the task force composition, it only includes staff members but has and will benefit from the expertise of those involved in the entertainment community. For example, the task force conducted a listening session with a focus group of event holders earlier this year, met with the sf entertainment commission director, is currently reaching out to the public via the survey, and will circle back with the entertainment community as it moves forward with implementing the suggestions put forth by the public. Given that today is now September 23rd, 2017, and that email was just sent to me on September 14th, and the Warehouse Fire happened on December 2nd, there has been plenty of time to do that, and to take more meaningful action. Like what? If I were to put on my economic development hat, I would call a real estate broker who specializes in warehouse development and go around the City with that person, making an inventory of warehouses - used and not used. I got this idea from a project I worked on as an intern in the Oakland Office of Economic Development. In 1987, it was my job to find a way to relocate pipes owned by East Bay Municipal Utilities District (EBMUD). My boss, Oakland Assistant City Manager Ezra Rapport, did not give me a road-map to use - he expected me, the Berkeley City Planning grad, to come up with the method myself. So I did. I found a site, and went about the task of relocating the pipes, stopped only by EBMUB, who's property manager had no idea Ezra put me up to the task. But if I can do that, then, 30 years later, what the hell is going on with the City of Oakland that it does not have staff members who take effective action? Rather than just posting a survey online, the task force should be expanded to include Oakland event producers like my friend Lionel Bea, and actually make a list of places that events have been held or could be held, and determine what's right and wrong with them via a combination of site visits, phone calls, emails, and information provided by organizations that have held (for example) art gallery tours.Then, draft a resolution for the Oakland City Council, and then get to work selling the plan to the City Council. And on the matter of Mr. Minor's concern about protecting “ the anonymity of the survey respondents, many of whom have expressed concern about either being displaced from their place of residence/assembly or having the venue shut down” - work can and should be done to identify and to help brings those persons and places into code compliance. That's what good economic development and planning work does. Stay tuned.
via IFTTT
https://youtu.be/XQSKoNE6AIg
In the wake of the tragic Oakland Ghost Ship Warehouse Fire that took 36 lives on December 2, 2016, The City of Oakland has still not taken any meaningful action to make sure that such an event does not occur again, save for one policy change: allowing Oakland Police Officers to tell the City about unpermitted events. This effort is also part of a survey that's under way and established by an inner-City-of-Oakland group called the Special Event Permit Redesign Task Force. Don't worry if you've not been informed about it as an Oakland resident; only City of Oakland staffers sit on it, and that's a bad idea. The Special Event Permit Redesign Task Force includes "Greg Minor and Nancy Marcus in the City's Administrator's Office, Kelley Kahn in the Mayor's Office, Jim MacIlvaine in the Cultural Affairs Office, Sgt. Andy McNeil in the Oakland Police Department, Assistant Fire Marshall Cesar Avila in the Oakland Fire Department, Tim Low in Building Services and Aubrey Rose in the Planning Department, (and) has identified several barriers that discourage compliance, as well as strategies to combat these obstacles." But on the survey page the task force does not explain what those "several barriers that discourage compliance, as well as strategies to combat these obstacles" are. The problem is what we in planning used to call "Analysis Paralysis" - or "the state of over-analyzing (or over-thinking) a situation so that a decision or action is never taken, in effect paralyzing the outcome." For example, the survey has been in existence for several months now, and no release of information from it has happened. Moreover, the survey itself lacks a way to determine the location of any venue that may be the focus of the response. There's a reason for this, if wrongheaded. Greg Minor, in The City's Administrator's Office, said in an email to me that... "The special event permit redesign survey did not include a question regarding the specific venue(s) associated with the survey respondents in order to protect the anonymity of the survey respondents, many of whom have expressed concern about either being displaced from their place of residence/assembly or having the venue shut down. In turn, this anonymity should maximize the amount of information the City receives from those currently holding unpermitted events. In terms of the task force composition, it only includes staff members but has and will benefit from the expertise of those involved in the entertainment community. For example, the task force conducted a listening session with a focus group of event holders earlier this year, met with the sf entertainment commission director, is currently reaching out to the public via the survey, and will circle back with the entertainment community as it moves forward with implementing the suggestions put forth by the public. Given that today is now September 23rd, 2017, and that email was just sent to me on September 14th, and the Warehouse Fire happened on December 2nd, there has been plenty of time to do that, and to take more meaningful action. Like what? If I were to put on my economic development hat, I would call a real estate broker who specializes in warehouse development and go around the City with that person, making an inventory of warehouses - used and not used. I got this idea from a project I worked on as an intern in the Oakland Office of Economic Development. In 1987, it was my job to find a way to relocate pipes owned by East Bay Municipal Utilities District (EBMUD). My boss, Oakland Assistant City Manager Ezra Rapport, did not give me a road-map to use - he expected me, the Berkeley City Planning grad, to come up with the method myself. So I did. I found a site, and went about the task of relocating the pipes, stopped only by EBMUB, who's property manager had no idea Ezra put me up to the task. But if I can do that, then, 30 years later, what the hell is going on with the City of Oakland that it does not have staff members who take effective action? Rather than just posting a survey online, the task force should be expanded to include Oakland event producers like my friend Lionel Bea, and actually make a list of places that events have been held or could be held, and determine what's right and wrong with them via a combination of site visits, phone calls, emails, and information provided by organizations that have held (for example) art gallery tours.Then, draft a resolution for the Oakland City Council, and then get to work selling the plan to the City Council. And on the matter of Mr. Minor's concern about protecting “ the anonymity of the survey respondents, many of whom have expressed concern about either being displaced from their place of residence/assembly or having the venue shut down” - work can and should be done to identify and to help brings those persons and places into code compliance. That's what good economic development and planning work does. Stay tuned.
via IFTTT
https://youtu.be/XQSKoNE6AIg
Is Oakland Special Event Permit Redesign Task Force Protecting Next Warehouse Fire Location?
Is Oakland Special Event Permit Redesign Task Force Protecting Next Warehouse Fire Location? - Video
In the wake of the tragic Oakland Ghost Ship Warehouse Fire that took 36 lives on December 2, 2016, The City of Oakland has still not taken any meaningful action to make sure that such an event does not occur again, save for one policy change: allowing Oakland Police Officers to tell the City about unpermitted events. This effort is also part of a survey that's under way and established by an inner-City-of-Oakland group called the Special Event Permit Redesign Task Force. Don't worry if you've not been informed about it as an Oakland resident; only City of Oakland staffers sit on it, and that's a bad idea. The Special Event Permit Redesign Task Force includes "Greg Minor and Nancy Marcus in the City's Administrator's Office, Kelley Kahn in the Mayor's Office, Jim MacIlvaine in the Cultural Affairs Office, Sgt. Andy McNeil in the Oakland Police Department, Assistant Fire Marshall Cesar Avila in the Oakland Fire Department, Tim Low in Building Services and Aubrey Rose in the Planning Department, (and) has identified several barriers that discourage compliance, as well as strategies to combat these obstacles." But on the survey page the task force does not explain what those "several barriers that discourage compliance, as well as strategies to combat these obstacles" are. The problem is what we in planning used to call "Analysis Paralysis" - or "the state of over-analyzing (or over-thinking) a situation so that a decision or action is never taken, in effect paralyzing the outcome." For example, the survey has been in existence for several months now, and no release of information from it has happened. Moreover, the survey itself lacks a way to determine the location of any venue that may be the focus of the response. There's a reason for this, if wrongheaded. Greg Minor, in The City's Administrator's Office, said in an email to me that... "The special event permit redesign survey did not include a question regarding the specific venue(s) associated with the survey respondents in order to protect the anonymity of the survey respondents, many of whom have expressed concern about either being displaced from their place of residence/assembly or having the venue shut down. In turn, this anonymity should maximize the amount of information the City receives from those currently holding unpermitted events. In terms of the task force composition, it only includes staff members but has and will benefit from the expertise of those involved in the entertainment community. For example, the task force conducted a listening session with a focus group of event holders earlier this year, met with the sf entertainment commission director, is currently reaching out to the public via the survey, and will circle back with the entertainment community as it moves forward with implementing the suggestions put forth by the public. Given that today is now September 23rd, 2017, and that email was just sent to me on September 14th, and the Warehouse Fire happened on December 2nd, there has been plenty of time to do that, and to take more meaningful action. Like what? If I were to put on my economic development hat, I would call a real estate broker who specializes in warehouse development and go around the City with that person, making an inventory of warehouses - used and not used. I got this idea from a project I worked on as an intern in the Oakland Office of Economic Development. In 1987, it was my job to find a way to relocate pipes owned by East Bay Municipal Utilities District (EBMUD). My boss, Oakland Assistant City Manager Ezra Rapport, did not give me a road-map to use - he expected me, the Berkeley City Planning grad, to come up with the method myself. So I did. I found a site, and went about the task of relocating the pipes, stopped only by EBMUB, who's property manager had no idea Ezra put me up to the task. But if I can do that, then, 30 years later, what the hell is going on with the City of Oakland that it does not have staff members who take effective action? Rather than just posting a survey online, the task force should be expanded to include Oakland event producers like my friend Lionel Bea, and actually make a list of places that events have been held or could be held, and determine what's right and wrong with them via a combination of site visits, phone calls, emails, and information provided by organizations that have held (for example) art gallery tours.Then, draft a resolution for the Oakland City Council, and then get to work selling the plan to the City Council. And on the matter of Mr. Minor's concern about protecting “ the anonymity of the survey respondents, many of whom have expressed concern about either being displaced from their place of residence/assembly or having the venue shut down” - work can and should be done to identify and to help brings those persons and places into code compliance. That's what good economic development and planning work does. Stay tuned.
via IFTTT
https://youtu.be/XQSKoNE6AIg
In the wake of the tragic Oakland Ghost Ship Warehouse Fire that took 36 lives on December 2, 2016, The City of Oakland has still not taken any meaningful action to make sure that such an event does not occur again, save for one policy change: allowing Oakland Police Officers to tell the City about unpermitted events. This effort is also part of a survey that's under way and established by an inner-City-of-Oakland group called the Special Event Permit Redesign Task Force. Don't worry if you've not been informed about it as an Oakland resident; only City of Oakland staffers sit on it, and that's a bad idea. The Special Event Permit Redesign Task Force includes "Greg Minor and Nancy Marcus in the City's Administrator's Office, Kelley Kahn in the Mayor's Office, Jim MacIlvaine in the Cultural Affairs Office, Sgt. Andy McNeil in the Oakland Police Department, Assistant Fire Marshall Cesar Avila in the Oakland Fire Department, Tim Low in Building Services and Aubrey Rose in the Planning Department, (and) has identified several barriers that discourage compliance, as well as strategies to combat these obstacles." But on the survey page the task force does not explain what those "several barriers that discourage compliance, as well as strategies to combat these obstacles" are. The problem is what we in planning used to call "Analysis Paralysis" - or "the state of over-analyzing (or over-thinking) a situation so that a decision or action is never taken, in effect paralyzing the outcome." For example, the survey has been in existence for several months now, and no release of information from it has happened. Moreover, the survey itself lacks a way to determine the location of any venue that may be the focus of the response. There's a reason for this, if wrongheaded. Greg Minor, in The City's Administrator's Office, said in an email to me that... "The special event permit redesign survey did not include a question regarding the specific venue(s) associated with the survey respondents in order to protect the anonymity of the survey respondents, many of whom have expressed concern about either being displaced from their place of residence/assembly or having the venue shut down. In turn, this anonymity should maximize the amount of information the City receives from those currently holding unpermitted events. In terms of the task force composition, it only includes staff members but has and will benefit from the expertise of those involved in the entertainment community. For example, the task force conducted a listening session with a focus group of event holders earlier this year, met with the sf entertainment commission director, is currently reaching out to the public via the survey, and will circle back with the entertainment community as it moves forward with implementing the suggestions put forth by the public. Given that today is now September 23rd, 2017, and that email was just sent to me on September 14th, and the Warehouse Fire happened on December 2nd, there has been plenty of time to do that, and to take more meaningful action. Like what? If I were to put on my economic development hat, I would call a real estate broker who specializes in warehouse development and go around the City with that person, making an inventory of warehouses - used and not used. I got this idea from a project I worked on as an intern in the Oakland Office of Economic Development. In 1987, it was my job to find a way to relocate pipes owned by East Bay Municipal Utilities District (EBMUD). My boss, Oakland Assistant City Manager Ezra Rapport, did not give me a road-map to use - he expected me, the Berkeley City Planning grad, to come up with the method myself. So I did. I found a site, and went about the task of relocating the pipes, stopped only by EBMUB, who's property manager had no idea Ezra put me up to the task. But if I can do that, then, 30 years later, what the hell is going on with the City of Oakland that it does not have staff members who take effective action? Rather than just posting a survey online, the task force should be expanded to include Oakland event producers like my friend Lionel Bea, and actually make a list of places that events have been held or could be held, and determine what's right and wrong with them via a combination of site visits, phone calls, emails, and information provided by organizations that have held (for example) art gallery tours.Then, draft a resolution for the Oakland City Council, and then get to work selling the plan to the City Council. And on the matter of Mr. Minor's concern about protecting “ the anonymity of the survey respondents, many of whom have expressed concern about either being displaced from their place of residence/assembly or having the venue shut down” - work can and should be done to identify and to help brings those persons and places into code compliance. That's what good economic development and planning work does. Stay tuned.
via IFTTT
https://youtu.be/XQSKoNE6AIg
Some People Use The Word Mansplaining In A Way That's Sexist And Cliche
Some People Use The Word Mansplaining In A Way That's Sexist And Cliche - Video
Some People Use The Word Mansplaining In A Way That's Sexist And Cliche Ok, so the social media topic was Star Trek: Discovery, where Sonequa Martin-Green played a starring role as First Officer Michael Burnham. The African American actress rightfully gained applause for her role in that position. But then came a number of tweets which seemed to imply that there had never been a black woman in space on television before. So, this fan of the original 1966 Star Trek Television series took to Twitter to issue a gentle reminder to Black Girl Nerds, the media organization who's content I love and mission is long overdue, that Sonequa Martin-Green was, by far, not the first sister in space. Of course, that title goes to the very awesome Nichelle Nichols, who played Lt. Uhura on Star Trek, and not just for the original series, but also for all of the movies, save for J.J. Abrams remake, where her character was represented by Zoe Saldana. Rather than push aside or forget Ms. Nichols, she should be revered as “the first,” and not forgotten. So, I point this out via Twitter and someone I don't know or will name chimes in accusing me of “mansplaining”. The definition of “mansplaining” is, according to Merriam-Webster Dictionary, “at its core, a very specific thing. It's what occurs when a man talks condescendingly to someone (especially a woman) about something he has incomplete knowledge of, with the mistaken assumption that he knows more about it than the person he's talking to does.” In my case, and as I pointed out on Twitter, I'm a fan of the original 1966 Star Trek Television series, and so I was taking up for Ms. Nichols. Guess what? I could have been a woman and done the exact same thing. In fact, I received a number of retweets and likes for my tweet coming to remind all of what Nichelle Nichols did. Then, there was one sister who comes up and accuses me of “mansplaining” - and as one who tires of clichés, that one sent me to the moon. It's overused. You have women and men telling men that they're mansplaining something, but it only takes a little thought to realize that their complaint, or attack, is sexist in itself. Part of this process of the mis-use of mansplaining is due to social media itself. There's such a rush to judge others via the medium that the persons who do it don't even stop for one moment to think about the appropriateness of their claim. So intent are they are scoring what I call “insult points”, that all logic goes out of the window. What results is an effort that's sexist. Just because the person appears to be a man (on social media, you don't always know), the responder slaps the mansplaining word, and thinks they scored insult points, and made themselves look like the cool, hip defender of whatever act they think is being put on women. In other words, all the effort to make themselves feel good by putting the other person down. Well, word up: I wasn't putting down Black Girl Nerds at all – just giving a friendly shout out for Nichelle Nichols. Just because I'm a guy doesn't mean a knee jerk response like mansplaining has to be the order of the day. Moreover, mansplaining, or what the blogger Rebecca Solnit described in her essay called “Men Explain Things to Me”, can just as easily be called “youngsplaining”, where a younger person talks to an older person as if the older person is out of touch with current life. Or, it can be called “whitesplaining”, where a white person, a man or woman, talks down to someone generally black or 'of color' because they don't think the person of color can possibly understand or know something about a practice (like, say, golf), that's commonly the province of someone white. (Or “blacksplaining” in the case where the person's black – just take “white” out of “whitesplaining” and replace it with “black” and you get “blacksplaining”. Whatever the case - mansplaining, or youngsplaining or whitesplaining or whateversplaining – the act is done to talk down to the person on the other end of the 'splaining, and is wrong. But in our zeal to right a wrong should not mean that being sexist (in the case of mansplaining), is OK. It should not mean that being ageist against young people is a good counter. And it should not mean that being racist against someone white is the right way to go, because it's not. You know the best thing to do? It's to stop having a categorization for every behavior we may perceive we don't like from someone. If we as a society were far less neuotic, we would not be havings these problems in communication, anyway. Stay tuned.
via IFTTT
https://youtu.be/uU8KQq9bnto
Some People Use The Word Mansplaining In A Way That's Sexist And Cliche Ok, so the social media topic was Star Trek: Discovery, where Sonequa Martin-Green played a starring role as First Officer Michael Burnham. The African American actress rightfully gained applause for her role in that position. But then came a number of tweets which seemed to imply that there had never been a black woman in space on television before. So, this fan of the original 1966 Star Trek Television series took to Twitter to issue a gentle reminder to Black Girl Nerds, the media organization who's content I love and mission is long overdue, that Sonequa Martin-Green was, by far, not the first sister in space. Of course, that title goes to the very awesome Nichelle Nichols, who played Lt. Uhura on Star Trek, and not just for the original series, but also for all of the movies, save for J.J. Abrams remake, where her character was represented by Zoe Saldana. Rather than push aside or forget Ms. Nichols, she should be revered as “the first,” and not forgotten. So, I point this out via Twitter and someone I don't know or will name chimes in accusing me of “mansplaining”. The definition of “mansplaining” is, according to Merriam-Webster Dictionary, “at its core, a very specific thing. It's what occurs when a man talks condescendingly to someone (especially a woman) about something he has incomplete knowledge of, with the mistaken assumption that he knows more about it than the person he's talking to does.” In my case, and as I pointed out on Twitter, I'm a fan of the original 1966 Star Trek Television series, and so I was taking up for Ms. Nichols. Guess what? I could have been a woman and done the exact same thing. In fact, I received a number of retweets and likes for my tweet coming to remind all of what Nichelle Nichols did. Then, there was one sister who comes up and accuses me of “mansplaining” - and as one who tires of clichés, that one sent me to the moon. It's overused. You have women and men telling men that they're mansplaining something, but it only takes a little thought to realize that their complaint, or attack, is sexist in itself. Part of this process of the mis-use of mansplaining is due to social media itself. There's such a rush to judge others via the medium that the persons who do it don't even stop for one moment to think about the appropriateness of their claim. So intent are they are scoring what I call “insult points”, that all logic goes out of the window. What results is an effort that's sexist. Just because the person appears to be a man (on social media, you don't always know), the responder slaps the mansplaining word, and thinks they scored insult points, and made themselves look like the cool, hip defender of whatever act they think is being put on women. In other words, all the effort to make themselves feel good by putting the other person down. Well, word up: I wasn't putting down Black Girl Nerds at all – just giving a friendly shout out for Nichelle Nichols. Just because I'm a guy doesn't mean a knee jerk response like mansplaining has to be the order of the day. Moreover, mansplaining, or what the blogger Rebecca Solnit described in her essay called “Men Explain Things to Me”, can just as easily be called “youngsplaining”, where a younger person talks to an older person as if the older person is out of touch with current life. Or, it can be called “whitesplaining”, where a white person, a man or woman, talks down to someone generally black or 'of color' because they don't think the person of color can possibly understand or know something about a practice (like, say, golf), that's commonly the province of someone white. (Or “blacksplaining” in the case where the person's black – just take “white” out of “whitesplaining” and replace it with “black” and you get “blacksplaining”. Whatever the case - mansplaining, or youngsplaining or whitesplaining or whateversplaining – the act is done to talk down to the person on the other end of the 'splaining, and is wrong. But in our zeal to right a wrong should not mean that being sexist (in the case of mansplaining), is OK. It should not mean that being ageist against young people is a good counter. And it should not mean that being racist against someone white is the right way to go, because it's not. You know the best thing to do? It's to stop having a categorization for every behavior we may perceive we don't like from someone. If we as a society were far less neuotic, we would not be havings these problems in communication, anyway. Stay tuned.
via IFTTT
https://youtu.be/uU8KQq9bnto
Some People Use The Word Mansplaining In A Way That's Sexist And Cliche
Some People Use The Word Mansplaining In A Way That's Sexist And Cliche - Video
Some People Use The Word Mansplaining In A Way That's Sexist And Cliche Ok, so the social media topic was Star Trek: Discovery, where Sonequa Martin-Green played a starring role as First Officer Michael Burnham. The African American actress rightfully gained applause for her role in that position. But then came a number of tweets which seemed to imply that there had never been a black woman in space on television before. So, this fan of the original 1966 Star Trek Television series took to Twitter to issue a gentle reminder to Black Girl Nerds, the media organization who's content I love and mission is long overdue, that Sonequa Martin-Green was, by far, not the first sister in space. Of course, that title goes to the very awesome Nichelle Nichols, who played Lt. Uhura on Star Trek, and not just for the original series, but also for all of the movies, save for J.J. Abrams remake, where her character was represented by Zoe Saldana. Rather than push aside or forget Ms. Nichols, she should be revered as “the first,” and not forgotten. So, I point this out via Twitter and someone I don't know or will name chimes in accusing me of “mansplaining”. The definition of “mansplaining” is, according to Merriam-Webster Dictionary, “at its core, a very specific thing. It's what occurs when a man talks condescendingly to someone (especially a woman) about something he has incomplete knowledge of, with the mistaken assumption that he knows more about it than the person he's talking to does.” In my case, and as I pointed out on Twitter, I'm a fan of the original 1966 Star Trek Television series, and so I was taking up for Ms. Nichols. Guess what? I could have been a woman and done the exact same thing. In fact, I received a number of retweets and likes for my tweet coming to remind all of what Nichelle Nichols did. Then, there was one sister who comes up and accuses me of “mansplaining” - and as one who tires of clichés, that one sent me to the moon. It's overused. You have women and men telling men that they're mansplaining something, but it only takes a little thought to realize that their complaint, or attack, is sexist in itself. Part of this process of the mis-use of mansplaining is due to social media itself. There's such a rush to judge others via the medium that the persons who do it don't even stop for one moment to think about the appropriateness of their claim. So intent are they are scoring what I call “insult points”, that all logic goes out of the window. What results is an effort that's sexist. Just because the person appears to be a man (on social media, you don't always know), the responder slaps the mansplaining word, and thinks they scored insult points, and made themselves look like the cool, hip defender of whatever act they think is being put on women. In other words, all the effort to make themselves feel good by putting the other person down. Well, word up: I wasn't putting down Black Girl Nerds at all – just giving a friendly shout out for Nichelle Nichols. Just because I'm a guy doesn't mean a knee jerk response like mansplaining has to be the order of the day. Moreover, mansplaining, or what the blogger Rebecca Solnit described in her essay called “Men Explain Things to Me”, can just as easily be called “youngsplaining”, where a younger person talks to an older person as if the older person is out of touch with current life. Or, it can be called “whitesplaining”, where a white person, a man or woman, talks down to someone generally black or 'of color' because they don't think the person of color can possibly understand or know something about a practice (like, say, golf), that's commonly the province of someone white. (Or “blacksplaining” in the case where the person's black – just take “white” out of “whitesplaining” and replace it with “black” and you get “blacksplaining”. Whatever the case - mansplaining, or youngsplaining or whitesplaining or whateversplaining – the act is done to talk down to the person on the other end of the 'splaining, and is wrong. But in our zeal to right a wrong should not mean that being sexist (in the case of mansplaining), is OK. It should not mean that being ageist against young people is a good counter. And it should not mean that being racist against someone white is the right way to go, because it's not. You know the best thing to do? It's to stop having a categorization for every behavior we may perceive we don't like from someone. If we as a society were far less neuotic, we would not be havings these problems in communication, anyway. Stay tuned.
via IFTTT
https://youtu.be/uU8KQq9bnto
Some People Use The Word Mansplaining In A Way That's Sexist And Cliche Ok, so the social media topic was Star Trek: Discovery, where Sonequa Martin-Green played a starring role as First Officer Michael Burnham. The African American actress rightfully gained applause for her role in that position. But then came a number of tweets which seemed to imply that there had never been a black woman in space on television before. So, this fan of the original 1966 Star Trek Television series took to Twitter to issue a gentle reminder to Black Girl Nerds, the media organization who's content I love and mission is long overdue, that Sonequa Martin-Green was, by far, not the first sister in space. Of course, that title goes to the very awesome Nichelle Nichols, who played Lt. Uhura on Star Trek, and not just for the original series, but also for all of the movies, save for J.J. Abrams remake, where her character was represented by Zoe Saldana. Rather than push aside or forget Ms. Nichols, she should be revered as “the first,” and not forgotten. So, I point this out via Twitter and someone I don't know or will name chimes in accusing me of “mansplaining”. The definition of “mansplaining” is, according to Merriam-Webster Dictionary, “at its core, a very specific thing. It's what occurs when a man talks condescendingly to someone (especially a woman) about something he has incomplete knowledge of, with the mistaken assumption that he knows more about it than the person he's talking to does.” In my case, and as I pointed out on Twitter, I'm a fan of the original 1966 Star Trek Television series, and so I was taking up for Ms. Nichols. Guess what? I could have been a woman and done the exact same thing. In fact, I received a number of retweets and likes for my tweet coming to remind all of what Nichelle Nichols did. Then, there was one sister who comes up and accuses me of “mansplaining” - and as one who tires of clichés, that one sent me to the moon. It's overused. You have women and men telling men that they're mansplaining something, but it only takes a little thought to realize that their complaint, or attack, is sexist in itself. Part of this process of the mis-use of mansplaining is due to social media itself. There's such a rush to judge others via the medium that the persons who do it don't even stop for one moment to think about the appropriateness of their claim. So intent are they are scoring what I call “insult points”, that all logic goes out of the window. What results is an effort that's sexist. Just because the person appears to be a man (on social media, you don't always know), the responder slaps the mansplaining word, and thinks they scored insult points, and made themselves look like the cool, hip defender of whatever act they think is being put on women. In other words, all the effort to make themselves feel good by putting the other person down. Well, word up: I wasn't putting down Black Girl Nerds at all – just giving a friendly shout out for Nichelle Nichols. Just because I'm a guy doesn't mean a knee jerk response like mansplaining has to be the order of the day. Moreover, mansplaining, or what the blogger Rebecca Solnit described in her essay called “Men Explain Things to Me”, can just as easily be called “youngsplaining”, where a younger person talks to an older person as if the older person is out of touch with current life. Or, it can be called “whitesplaining”, where a white person, a man or woman, talks down to someone generally black or 'of color' because they don't think the person of color can possibly understand or know something about a practice (like, say, golf), that's commonly the province of someone white. (Or “blacksplaining” in the case where the person's black – just take “white” out of “whitesplaining” and replace it with “black” and you get “blacksplaining”. Whatever the case - mansplaining, or youngsplaining or whitesplaining or whateversplaining – the act is done to talk down to the person on the other end of the 'splaining, and is wrong. But in our zeal to right a wrong should not mean that being sexist (in the case of mansplaining), is OK. It should not mean that being ageist against young people is a good counter. And it should not mean that being racist against someone white is the right way to go, because it's not. You know the best thing to do? It's to stop having a categorization for every behavior we may perceive we don't like from someone. If we as a society were far less neuotic, we would not be havings these problems in communication, anyway. Stay tuned.
via IFTTT
https://youtu.be/uU8KQq9bnto
