Will Oakland Raiders Fire Jack Del Rio And Todd Downing? Las Vegas NFL Stadium News? - Video
Will Oakland Raiders Fire Jack Del Rio And Todd Downing? Las Vegas NFL Stadium News? PLEASE INVEST IN ZENNIE62MEDIA VIA PAYPALHERE: http://ift.tt/2u7j8De
via IFTTT
https://youtu.be/hwV_YEzAydI
Wednesday, December 27, 2017
Willy Hernangomez knows decision on his Knicks’ future is coming – New York Post
New York PostI love New York. KP is here. But I want to play. “I’m young, it’s my second year, I have to play to get better. I’ve been working really hard every day. Everything I do is 100 percent.” The Knicks management team of president Steve Mills and general … and more …read more […]
from WordPress http://ift.tt/2C1MAPW
via IFTTT
from WordPress http://ift.tt/2C1MAPW
via IFTTT
STYX Tommy Shaw, Will Evankovich On New Album The Mission January 9th 2PM LVCC Central Hall #14735
STYX Tommy Shaw, Will Evankovich On New Album The Mission January 9th 2PM LVCC Central Hall #14735 - Video
CES 2018 STYX Tommy Shaw, Will Evankovich On New Album The Mission January 9th 2PM LVCC Central Hall #14735
via IFTTT
https://youtu.be/w4ct3kfkxIo
CES 2018 STYX Tommy Shaw, Will Evankovich On New Album The Mission January 9th 2PM LVCC Central Hall #14735
via IFTTT
https://youtu.be/w4ct3kfkxIo
STYX Tommy Shaw, Will Evankovich On New Album The Mission January 9th 2PM LVCC Central Hall #14735
STYX Tommy Shaw, Will Evankovich On New Album The Mission January 9th 2PM LVCC Central Hall #14735 - Video
STYX Tommy Shaw, Will Evankovich On New Album The Mission January 9th 2PM LVCC Central Hall #14735 CES 2018 Las Vegas
via IFTTT
https://youtu.be/w4ct3kfkxIo
STYX Tommy Shaw, Will Evankovich On New Album The Mission January 9th 2PM LVCC Central Hall #14735 CES 2018 Las Vegas
via IFTTT
https://youtu.be/w4ct3kfkxIo
Killings in New York Fall to a Record Low as Crime Rate Dives Over All – New York Times
New York TimesIn fact, crime has fallen in New York City in each of the major felony categories — murder and manslaughter, rape, assault, robbery, burglary, grand larceny, and car thefts — to a total of 94,806 as of Sunday, well below the previous record low of … …read more Source:: New York City News […]
from WordPress http://ift.tt/2CeeTtL
via IFTTT
from WordPress http://ift.tt/2CeeTtL
via IFTTT
Putin Will Win in Russia. So Why Exclude Navalny? – New York Times
New York Times“Once someone is on the ballot, even someone who is considered a sure loser, the outcome is no longer under control,” said William Taubman, professor emeritus at Amherst College and author of a new biography of Mikhail S. Gorbachev. “Witness Trump’s … and more …read more Source:: New York City News By Google […]
from WordPress http://ift.tt/2zDfm3i
via IFTTT
from WordPress http://ift.tt/2zDfm3i
via IFTTT
New York Today: Kelly Hall-Tompkins, a New Yorker of the Year – New York Times
New York TimesGood morning on this frigid Wednesday. This month, we asked readers to nominate candidates for New York Today’s New Yorkers of the Year, our annual celebration of citizens who have made a difference in the city over the last 12 months. We received more … …read more Source:: New York City News By […]
from WordPress http://ift.tt/2zCsGoo
via IFTTT
from WordPress http://ift.tt/2zCsGoo
via IFTTT
Clark County Zoning Board Gets Bad Oakland Raiders Las Vegas NFL Stadium Infrastructure Development
Clark County Zoning Board Gets Bad Oakland Raiders Las Vegas NFL Stadium Infrastructure Development - Video
Clark County Zoning Board Gets Misnamed, Incomplete Oakland Raiders UNLV NFL Stadium Infrastructure Development Agreement On January 3rd 2018, the Clark County Board of Commissioners, meeting as the Zoning Committee, will take up the reqiest by Clark County Planning Department Staff to approve a 56-page document that's both mis-named and incomplete. It's called “A Development Agreement With LV Stadium And Events Company”, which inplies that Clark County will take up the full and complete development agreement as spelled out in Section 29 of the Southern Nevada Tourism and Infrastructure Committee (SNTIA). But in point of fact, the agreement only covers who does what and pays for what with respect to roads, and sewers and street lights with respct to the Oakland Raiders / Las Vegas UNLV NFL Stadium – it has nothing to do with the more complex specifications for the stadium events center itself. Additionally, the infrastructure development agreement has no language that explains under what authority the stadium is to be constructed, and under what legal direction the infrastructure work is to be done. For example, the SNTIA Section 29, 2 (h) calls for developer, that's the Raiders to “Provide for an adequate contribution by the developer partner for the construction or improvement of any infrastructure off the site of the project that is determined to be necessary for the project by the Department of Transportation, the County or any municipality in which the project is located and that is specified in the regional infrastructure and service evaluation required for a high mpact project before a special use permit is issued for the project; The (what should be called) Clark County Las Vegas Stadium Infrastructure And Transportation Development Agreement does not name the SNTIA as its reference document, but then is written to assign basicaly the same set of responsibiltiies to the Developer, which is the Raiders, as the SNTIA. Does that mean the eventual development agreement written for the Stadium Authority will not include that assignment of responsibility, even though the law says it has to be there? It looks like a kind of “left-hand” versus “right-hand” problem, where we have Clark County Commissioner Steve Sisolak leading Clark County staffers in one direction, almost without the involvement of the Stadium Authority. I say that because his name and signature is attached to the reports on the agenda item. Thus, we have Sisolak representing the “left-hand” and the Las Vegas Stadium Authority as the “right-hand” and they're obviously not connected to any body in the middle. Going back to Section 29, 2 (h), where's the language saying that the Raiders have to provide an adequate contribution by the developer partner for the construction or improvement of any infrastructure off the site of the project that is determined to be necessary for the project by the Department of Transportation, the County, as per the SNTIA? Yes, the overall order of the development agreement has the Raiders as developer agreeing to pay for And under “Property Dedications” in the (what should be called) Clark County Las Vegas Stadium Infrastructure And Transportation Development Agreement, no mention is made of the process called for in the SNTIA and where the land is to be conveyed from the Raiders as Developer to the Stadium Authority, and not to Clark County without the Stadium Authority, which is required for the purpose of issuing bonds with respect to the $750 million subsidy. The Clark County document acts as if there is no need for the Stadium Authority in this case, when it is there for the issuance of bonds in partnership with Clark County. In short, the document was written with no reference to the SNTIA or the Las Vegas Stadium Authority Board, even though the SNTIA gives the County its powers of assignment of infrastructure development with respect to the stadium project, just by mention. But the SNTIA also has the Stadium Authority Board in position to issue approval on activities that may have to be done by the Raiders as developer – see SNTIA Section 29, 2(i). The sections of the Clark County agreement, like Section 2.01 (c) called “County Authorization, Hearing, and Ordinance”, makes no mention of the SNTIA as the true governing law representing the State of Nevada. It's as if the Governor of Nevada had nothing to do with the stadium, let alone form the Southern Nevada Tourism and Infrastructure Committee that wrote the recommendations that the Nevada Legislature approved to become the SNTIA. Is Sisolak trying to pull a fast one on the Stadium Authority? Why? Is he concerned the Raiders will miss the stadium documents timeliine? It certainly looks like it. Whatever the reason, he made a mistake: the document must be rewritten to bring it in line with the law and what the Stadium Authority Board is charged to do. Stay tuned.
via IFTTT
https://youtu.be/tNEJY8Ca57E
Clark County Zoning Board Gets Misnamed, Incomplete Oakland Raiders UNLV NFL Stadium Infrastructure Development Agreement On January 3rd 2018, the Clark County Board of Commissioners, meeting as the Zoning Committee, will take up the reqiest by Clark County Planning Department Staff to approve a 56-page document that's both mis-named and incomplete. It's called “A Development Agreement With LV Stadium And Events Company”, which inplies that Clark County will take up the full and complete development agreement as spelled out in Section 29 of the Southern Nevada Tourism and Infrastructure Committee (SNTIA). But in point of fact, the agreement only covers who does what and pays for what with respect to roads, and sewers and street lights with respct to the Oakland Raiders / Las Vegas UNLV NFL Stadium – it has nothing to do with the more complex specifications for the stadium events center itself. Additionally, the infrastructure development agreement has no language that explains under what authority the stadium is to be constructed, and under what legal direction the infrastructure work is to be done. For example, the SNTIA Section 29, 2 (h) calls for developer, that's the Raiders to “Provide for an adequate contribution by the developer partner for the construction or improvement of any infrastructure off the site of the project that is determined to be necessary for the project by the Department of Transportation, the County or any municipality in which the project is located and that is specified in the regional infrastructure and service evaluation required for a high mpact project before a special use permit is issued for the project; The (what should be called) Clark County Las Vegas Stadium Infrastructure And Transportation Development Agreement does not name the SNTIA as its reference document, but then is written to assign basicaly the same set of responsibiltiies to the Developer, which is the Raiders, as the SNTIA. Does that mean the eventual development agreement written for the Stadium Authority will not include that assignment of responsibility, even though the law says it has to be there? It looks like a kind of “left-hand” versus “right-hand” problem, where we have Clark County Commissioner Steve Sisolak leading Clark County staffers in one direction, almost without the involvement of the Stadium Authority. I say that because his name and signature is attached to the reports on the agenda item. Thus, we have Sisolak representing the “left-hand” and the Las Vegas Stadium Authority as the “right-hand” and they're obviously not connected to any body in the middle. Going back to Section 29, 2 (h), where's the language saying that the Raiders have to provide an adequate contribution by the developer partner for the construction or improvement of any infrastructure off the site of the project that is determined to be necessary for the project by the Department of Transportation, the County, as per the SNTIA? Yes, the overall order of the development agreement has the Raiders as developer agreeing to pay for And under “Property Dedications” in the (what should be called) Clark County Las Vegas Stadium Infrastructure And Transportation Development Agreement, no mention is made of the process called for in the SNTIA and where the land is to be conveyed from the Raiders as Developer to the Stadium Authority, and not to Clark County without the Stadium Authority, which is required for the purpose of issuing bonds with respect to the $750 million subsidy. The Clark County document acts as if there is no need for the Stadium Authority in this case, when it is there for the issuance of bonds in partnership with Clark County. In short, the document was written with no reference to the SNTIA or the Las Vegas Stadium Authority Board, even though the SNTIA gives the County its powers of assignment of infrastructure development with respect to the stadium project, just by mention. But the SNTIA also has the Stadium Authority Board in position to issue approval on activities that may have to be done by the Raiders as developer – see SNTIA Section 29, 2(i). The sections of the Clark County agreement, like Section 2.01 (c) called “County Authorization, Hearing, and Ordinance”, makes no mention of the SNTIA as the true governing law representing the State of Nevada. It's as if the Governor of Nevada had nothing to do with the stadium, let alone form the Southern Nevada Tourism and Infrastructure Committee that wrote the recommendations that the Nevada Legislature approved to become the SNTIA. Is Sisolak trying to pull a fast one on the Stadium Authority? Why? Is he concerned the Raiders will miss the stadium documents timeliine? It certainly looks like it. Whatever the reason, he made a mistake: the document must be rewritten to bring it in line with the law and what the Stadium Authority Board is charged to do. Stay tuned.
via IFTTT
https://youtu.be/tNEJY8Ca57E
Clark County Zoning Board Gets Bad Oakland Raiders Las Vegas NFL Stadium Infrastructure Development
Clark County Zoning Board Gets Bad Oakland Raiders Las Vegas NFL Stadium Infrastructure Development - Video
Clark County Zoning Board Gets Misnamed, Incomplete Oakland Raiders UNLV NFL Stadium Infrastructure Development Agreement On January 3rd 2018, the Clark County Board of Commissioners, meeting as the Zoning Committee, will take up the reqiest by Clark County Planning Department Staff to approve a 56-page document that's both mis-named and incomplete. It's called “A Development Agreement With LV Stadium And Events Company”, which inplies that Clark County will take up the full and complete development agreement as spelled out in Section 29 of the Southern Nevada Tourism and Infrastructure Committee (SNTIA). But in point of fact, the agreement only covers who does what and pays for what with respect to roads, and sewers and street lights with respct to the Oakland Raiders / Las Vegas UNLV NFL Stadium – it has nothing to do with the more complex specifications for the stadium events center itself. Additionally, the infrastructure development agreement has no language that explains under what authority the stadium is to be constructed, and under what legal direction the infrastructure work is to be done. For example, the SNTIA Section 29, 2 (h) calls for developer, that's the Raiders to “Provide for an adequate contribution by the developer partner for the construction or improvement of any infrastructure off the site of the project that is determined to be necessary for the project by the Department of Transportation, the County or any municipality in which the project is located and that is specified in the regional infrastructure and service evaluation required for a high mpact project before a special use permit is issued for the project; The (what should be called) Clark County Las Vegas Stadium Infrastructure And Transportation Development Agreement does not name the SNTIA as its reference document, but then is written to assign basicaly the same set of responsibiltiies to the Developer, which is the Raiders, as the SNTIA. Does that mean the eventual development agreement written for the Stadium Authority will not include that assignment of responsibility, even though the law says it has to be there? It looks like a kind of “left-hand” versus “right-hand” problem, where we have Clark County Commissioner Steve Sisolak leading Clark County staffers in one direction, almost without the involvement of the Stadium Authority. I say that because his name and signature is attached to the reports on the agenda item. Thus, we have Sisolak representing the “left-hand” and the Las Vegas Stadium Authority as the “right-hand” and they're obviously not connected to any body in the middle. Going back to Section 29, 2 (h), where's the language saying that the Raiders have to provide an adequate contribution by the developer partner for the construction or improvement of any infrastructure off the site of the project that is determined to be necessary for the project by the Department of Transportation, the County, as per the SNTIA? Yes, the overall order of the development agreement has the Raiders as developer agreeing to pay for And under “Property Dedications” in the (what should be called) Clark County Las Vegas Stadium Infrastructure And Transportation Development Agreement, no mention is made of the process called for in the SNTIA and where the land is to be conveyed from the Raiders as Developer to the Stadium Authority, and not to Clark County without the Stadium Authority, which is required for the purpose of issuing bonds with respect to the $750 million subsidy. The Clark County document acts as if there is no need for the Stadium Authority in this case, when it is there for the issuance of bonds in partnership with Clark County. In short, the document was written with no reference to the SNTIA or the Las Vegas Stadium Authority Board, even though the SNTIA gives the County its powers of assignment of infrastructure development with respect to the stadium project, just by mention. But the SNTIA also has the Stadium Authority Board in position to issue approval on activities that may have to be done by the Raiders as developer – see SNTIA Section 29, 2(i). The sections of the Clark County agreement, like Section 2.01 (c) called “County Authorization, Hearing, and Ordinance”, makes no mention of the SNTIA as the true governing law representing the State of Nevada. It's as if the Governor of Nevada had nothing to do with the stadium, let alone form the Southern Nevada Tourism and Infrastructure Committee that wrote the recommendations that the Nevada Legislature approved to become the SNTIA. Is Sisolak trying to pull a fast one on the Stadium Authority? Why? Is he concerned the Raiders will miss the stadium documents timeliine? It certainly looks like it. Whatever the reason, he made a mistake: the document must be rewritten to bring it in line with the law and what the Stadium Authority Board is charged to do. Stay tuned.
via IFTTT
https://youtu.be/tNEJY8Ca57E
Clark County Zoning Board Gets Misnamed, Incomplete Oakland Raiders UNLV NFL Stadium Infrastructure Development Agreement On January 3rd 2018, the Clark County Board of Commissioners, meeting as the Zoning Committee, will take up the reqiest by Clark County Planning Department Staff to approve a 56-page document that's both mis-named and incomplete. It's called “A Development Agreement With LV Stadium And Events Company”, which inplies that Clark County will take up the full and complete development agreement as spelled out in Section 29 of the Southern Nevada Tourism and Infrastructure Committee (SNTIA). But in point of fact, the agreement only covers who does what and pays for what with respect to roads, and sewers and street lights with respct to the Oakland Raiders / Las Vegas UNLV NFL Stadium – it has nothing to do with the more complex specifications for the stadium events center itself. Additionally, the infrastructure development agreement has no language that explains under what authority the stadium is to be constructed, and under what legal direction the infrastructure work is to be done. For example, the SNTIA Section 29, 2 (h) calls for developer, that's the Raiders to “Provide for an adequate contribution by the developer partner for the construction or improvement of any infrastructure off the site of the project that is determined to be necessary for the project by the Department of Transportation, the County or any municipality in which the project is located and that is specified in the regional infrastructure and service evaluation required for a high mpact project before a special use permit is issued for the project; The (what should be called) Clark County Las Vegas Stadium Infrastructure And Transportation Development Agreement does not name the SNTIA as its reference document, but then is written to assign basicaly the same set of responsibiltiies to the Developer, which is the Raiders, as the SNTIA. Does that mean the eventual development agreement written for the Stadium Authority will not include that assignment of responsibility, even though the law says it has to be there? It looks like a kind of “left-hand” versus “right-hand” problem, where we have Clark County Commissioner Steve Sisolak leading Clark County staffers in one direction, almost without the involvement of the Stadium Authority. I say that because his name and signature is attached to the reports on the agenda item. Thus, we have Sisolak representing the “left-hand” and the Las Vegas Stadium Authority as the “right-hand” and they're obviously not connected to any body in the middle. Going back to Section 29, 2 (h), where's the language saying that the Raiders have to provide an adequate contribution by the developer partner for the construction or improvement of any infrastructure off the site of the project that is determined to be necessary for the project by the Department of Transportation, the County, as per the SNTIA? Yes, the overall order of the development agreement has the Raiders as developer agreeing to pay for And under “Property Dedications” in the (what should be called) Clark County Las Vegas Stadium Infrastructure And Transportation Development Agreement, no mention is made of the process called for in the SNTIA and where the land is to be conveyed from the Raiders as Developer to the Stadium Authority, and not to Clark County without the Stadium Authority, which is required for the purpose of issuing bonds with respect to the $750 million subsidy. The Clark County document acts as if there is no need for the Stadium Authority in this case, when it is there for the issuance of bonds in partnership with Clark County. In short, the document was written with no reference to the SNTIA or the Las Vegas Stadium Authority Board, even though the SNTIA gives the County its powers of assignment of infrastructure development with respect to the stadium project, just by mention. But the SNTIA also has the Stadium Authority Board in position to issue approval on activities that may have to be done by the Raiders as developer – see SNTIA Section 29, 2(i). The sections of the Clark County agreement, like Section 2.01 (c) called “County Authorization, Hearing, and Ordinance”, makes no mention of the SNTIA as the true governing law representing the State of Nevada. It's as if the Governor of Nevada had nothing to do with the stadium, let alone form the Southern Nevada Tourism and Infrastructure Committee that wrote the recommendations that the Nevada Legislature approved to become the SNTIA. Is Sisolak trying to pull a fast one on the Stadium Authority? Why? Is he concerned the Raiders will miss the stadium documents timeliine? It certainly looks like it. Whatever the reason, he made a mistake: the document must be rewritten to bring it in line with the law and what the Stadium Authority Board is charged to do. Stay tuned.
via IFTTT
https://youtu.be/tNEJY8Ca57E
4 people found dead in basement in New York – CNN
CNN(CNN) New York authorities are investigating the deaths of four people after the bodies were found in a basement apartment in Troy a day after Christmas. Police and medics found the victims after a property manager reported four unresponsive people in …4 found dead in basement apartment in Troy, New YorkABC News4 Found Dead In […]
from WordPress http://ift.tt/2zAq7Ud
via IFTTT
from WordPress http://ift.tt/2zAq7Ud
via IFTTT
