Chris Christie Attacks Marco Rubio for Being Hard to Find in New HampshireNew York TimesChris Christie, who is enjoying a bump in popularity in New Hampshire, mocked Marco Rubio on Saturday for not visiting the state more often. With more pointed comments than usual and a dismissive aside — “He’s never here” — Mr. Christie, […]
from WordPress http://ift.tt/1lFjSYM
via IFTTT
Saturday, December 12, 2015
Derrick Henry Captures Alabama's Second Heisman – New York Times
Derrick Henry Captures Alabama’s Second HeismanNew York TimesHenry, a junior who accounted for more than a third of Alabama’s total yardage, will lead the Crimson Tide into its matchup against Michigan State in the College Football Playoff semifinals on New Year’s Eve at the Cotton Bowl. As his stature grew …and more …read more From:: […]
from WordPress http://ift.tt/1OpcNSI
via IFTTT
from WordPress http://ift.tt/1OpcNSI
via IFTTT
Warriors Fall to Bucks, Ending Perfect Start – New York Times
Warriors Fall to Bucks, Ending Perfect StartNew York TimesThe Warriors won the next three games against Cleveland to clinch the championship. Then came the 24 victories to start this season, a record start. Now the Warriors head home, to face the Phoenix Suns on Wednesday — at which point, a new streak might …and more […]
from WordPress http://ift.tt/1lFjSYJ
via IFTTT
from WordPress http://ift.tt/1lFjSYJ
via IFTTT
SNL's Greta Van Susteren Suffers Through Ted Cruz, Chris Christie, and Ben Carson – Mediaite
SNL’s Greta Van Susteren Suffers Through Ted Cruz, Chris Christie, and Ben CarsonMediaiteScreen Shot 2015-12-13 at 12.03.51 AM Ted Cruz’s media moment has arrived, if this week’s Saturday Night Live is any indication. On the sketch show’s version of Fox News’ On the Record, Kate McKinnon’s Greta Van Susteren suffered through a slate of … […]
from WordPress http://ift.tt/1SUYtFd
via IFTTT
from WordPress http://ift.tt/1SUYtFd
via IFTTT
Liked on YouTube: Al Gore Applauds Paris Agreement On Climate Change
Al Gore Applauds Paris Agreement On Climate Change - Video
Al Gore, who was one of the first leaders to point to the climate change problem, applauds the Paris Agreement on climate change, today. The Paris Agreement involved 200 countries. Stay tuned.
via IFTTT
http://youtu.be/2kVW_JOy4bE
Al Gore, who was one of the first leaders to point to the climate change problem, applauds the Paris Agreement on climate change, today. The Paris Agreement involved 200 countries. Stay tuned.
via IFTTT
http://youtu.be/2kVW_JOy4bE
Al Gore Applauds Paris Agreement On Climate Change
Al Gore Applauds Paris Agreement On Climate Change - Video
Al Gore, who was one of the first leaders to point to the climate change problem, applauds the Paris Agreement on climate change, today. The Paris Agreement involved 200 countries. Stay tuned.
via IFTTT
http://youtu.be/2kVW_JOy4bE
Al Gore, who was one of the first leaders to point to the climate change problem, applauds the Paris Agreement on climate change, today. The Paris Agreement involved 200 countries. Stay tuned.
via IFTTT
http://youtu.be/2kVW_JOy4bE
The Rise of Hate Search – New York Times
The Rise of Hate SearchNew York TimesSubtly provoking their curiosity, giving them new information, and offering them new images of the group that is stoking their rage: That may direct their thoughts in different, more positive directions. After sifting through the search data, we think …and more …read more From:: New York City News By […]
from WordPress http://ift.tt/1TI9aLm
via IFTTT
from WordPress http://ift.tt/1TI9aLm
via IFTTT
Peddlers flock to New York City for 'coniferous tree' season – Fox11online.com
Peddlers flock to New York City for ‘coniferous tree’ seasonFox11online.comIn this Tuesday, Dec. 8, 2015, photo, Laura Miller carries a tree she just sold at her Laura’s Christmas Trees stand on the Upper West Side neighborhood of Manhattan in New York. Each holiday season stands of Christmas trees from Vermont, Canada and …and more …read […]
from WordPress http://ift.tt/1TI9bPx
via IFTTT
from WordPress http://ift.tt/1TI9bPx
via IFTTT
Residents Head Outside For Weekend Fun As Warm Weather Trend Continues Across … – CBS Local
Residents Head Outside For Weekend Fun As Warm Weather Trend Continues Across …CBS LocalNEW YORK (CBSNewYork) — People across New York City are out and about enjoying record warmth in December. As 60-degree temperatures hit the Tri-State area for the third day in a row, people are questioning whether the region will ever see a […]
from WordPress http://ift.tt/1TI9bPr
via IFTTT
from WordPress http://ift.tt/1TI9bPr
via IFTTT
Michael Cuddyer surprising retirement news could help the Mets make run at … – New York Daily News
Michael Cuddyer surprising retirement news could help the Mets make run at …New York Daily NewsThe Cuban slugger carried the Mets for a month at the end of the season and has said repeatedly he’d like to play in New York if he gets the right deal. While assistant GM John Ricco said earlier this […]
from WordPress http://ift.tt/1TI9auS
via IFTTT
from WordPress http://ift.tt/1TI9auS
via IFTTT
Liked on YouTube: Warriors 24-0 Beat Celtics In OT 124-119
Warriors 24-0 Beat Celtics In OT 124-119 - Video
Warriors 24-0, Beat Celtics In OT 124-119 The Golden State Warriors are on a roll. The team that plays in Oakland just won its 24th straight game : 124 - 119 over the Boston Celtics in overtime. The Warriors have won 28 straight games going back to last season to this point.
via IFTTT
http://youtu.be/znqqU6f2NRQ
Warriors 24-0, Beat Celtics In OT 124-119 The Golden State Warriors are on a roll. The team that plays in Oakland just won its 24th straight game : 124 - 119 over the Boston Celtics in overtime. The Warriors have won 28 straight games going back to last season to this point.
via IFTTT
http://youtu.be/znqqU6f2NRQ
Friday, December 11, 2015
Warriors 24-0 Beat Celtics In OT 124-119
Warriors 24-0 Beat Celtics In OT 124-119 - Video
Warriors 24-0, Beat Celtics In OT 124-119 The Golden State Warriors are on a roll. The team that plays in Oakland just won its 24th straight game : 124 - 119 over the Boston Celtics in overtime. The Warriors have won 28 straight games going back to last season to this point.
via IFTTT
http://youtu.be/znqqU6f2NRQ
Warriors 24-0, Beat Celtics In OT 124-119 The Golden State Warriors are on a roll. The team that plays in Oakland just won its 24th straight game : 124 - 119 over the Boston Celtics in overtime. The Warriors have won 28 straight games going back to last season to this point.
via IFTTT
http://youtu.be/znqqU6f2NRQ
Liked on YouTube: NFL Raiders Worth $3 Billion With Privately Financed Oakland Stadium
NFL Raiders Worth $3 Billion With Privately Financed Oakland Stadium - Video
The Oakland Raiders are worth $3 billion with a new privately financed stadium in Oakland. That is more than they would be valued at in Carson, California. The Oakland Raiders have been working at once to stay in Oakland, but also to be part of a two-team NFL stadium planned for Carson, California. The basic assumption has been that Los Angeles is a more valuable region than the San Francisco Bay Area, and in particular Oakland and the East Bay Area. But a look at per capita gross metropolitan economic product, as well as a specific private stadium proposal in Oakland and at the Coliseum, reveals the Raiders would be worth $3 billion if they stayed in Oakland under the scenario you are about to see. The information is important, considering the NFL process for allowing the Raiders to leave Oakland, as stated in its franchise relocation policy. The Raiders are required to offer a “statement of reasons” for wanting to leave Oakland. It appears that one of those reasons would have to be listed as “desire to be in a region where it would be worth less than in Oakland.” That, coupled with any negative representations of Raider Nation in Oakland and in Northern California would be a public relations disaster. It's also important because the parties working on the NFL Carson project in LA don't have a fiscal picture that's that attractive to the Raiders – the team would be sharing a stadium with the San Diego Chargers, that and considering the rather substandard number of luxury suites proposed gives us a scenario where the Raiders down there in LA would only have half ownership of a $1.7 billion stadium and that would come to $850 million. Moreover, the Carson location is part of a metropolitan area that is ranked 17th in per capita gross metropolitan product, where San Francisco and San Jose are ranked number 3 and number 1, and Oakland - which was not part of the Bloomberg survey - sits in between them. That means the Bay Area has more spending money than the LA basin and by a wide margin. Looking At The Stadium Numbers Since the Raiders don't own the Oakland Coliseum, and are worth $1.45 billion, we can conservatively add that to the LA stadium value and come to this figure: $2.3 billion. By contrast, in Oakland, the stadium plan concept that Oakland Raiders Owner Mark Davis asked me to come up with adds up to significant gains for the Silver and Black. The stadium, as well as a stadium for the Oakland A's, would be paid for via an industrial development lease revenue bond issue structure. That means no public subsidy or bond default backing by the government. The new stadium itself is at $900 million in Oakland, so the Raiders are already $50 million ahead in Oakland. The Raiders wing of the hotel is part owned by the team, and so that portion comes in at about $80 million. That base of property pushes the Raiders up by $980 million – and that does not even take in expected revenue streams. Right there, when we add in the base of $1.45 billion, that is $2.43 billion. The overall expected 40 year revenue stream to the Raiders in Oakland is $2.8 billion and that is from the stadium, alone and does not include NFL revenue sources or team sponsorship or merchandise sales. But the spreadsheet number comes to $69 million annually. Add that to the $2.43 billion and we have $3.12 billion. So the question remains: if the Raiders are considering a move out of Oakland and to a situation where they are sharing a stadium, it's clear staying in Oakland and using some deal structure close to what I have come up with is better. It also damages any “statement of reasons” the Raiders would give in a relocation filing. In fact, it would make them look, well, you know. Stay tuned.
via IFTTT
http://youtu.be/-uC1uKv7i3s
The Oakland Raiders are worth $3 billion with a new privately financed stadium in Oakland. That is more than they would be valued at in Carson, California. The Oakland Raiders have been working at once to stay in Oakland, but also to be part of a two-team NFL stadium planned for Carson, California. The basic assumption has been that Los Angeles is a more valuable region than the San Francisco Bay Area, and in particular Oakland and the East Bay Area. But a look at per capita gross metropolitan economic product, as well as a specific private stadium proposal in Oakland and at the Coliseum, reveals the Raiders would be worth $3 billion if they stayed in Oakland under the scenario you are about to see. The information is important, considering the NFL process for allowing the Raiders to leave Oakland, as stated in its franchise relocation policy. The Raiders are required to offer a “statement of reasons” for wanting to leave Oakland. It appears that one of those reasons would have to be listed as “desire to be in a region where it would be worth less than in Oakland.” That, coupled with any negative representations of Raider Nation in Oakland and in Northern California would be a public relations disaster. It's also important because the parties working on the NFL Carson project in LA don't have a fiscal picture that's that attractive to the Raiders – the team would be sharing a stadium with the San Diego Chargers, that and considering the rather substandard number of luxury suites proposed gives us a scenario where the Raiders down there in LA would only have half ownership of a $1.7 billion stadium and that would come to $850 million. Moreover, the Carson location is part of a metropolitan area that is ranked 17th in per capita gross metropolitan product, where San Francisco and San Jose are ranked number 3 and number 1, and Oakland - which was not part of the Bloomberg survey - sits in between them. That means the Bay Area has more spending money than the LA basin and by a wide margin. Looking At The Stadium Numbers Since the Raiders don't own the Oakland Coliseum, and are worth $1.45 billion, we can conservatively add that to the LA stadium value and come to this figure: $2.3 billion. By contrast, in Oakland, the stadium plan concept that Oakland Raiders Owner Mark Davis asked me to come up with adds up to significant gains for the Silver and Black. The stadium, as well as a stadium for the Oakland A's, would be paid for via an industrial development lease revenue bond issue structure. That means no public subsidy or bond default backing by the government. The new stadium itself is at $900 million in Oakland, so the Raiders are already $50 million ahead in Oakland. The Raiders wing of the hotel is part owned by the team, and so that portion comes in at about $80 million. That base of property pushes the Raiders up by $980 million – and that does not even take in expected revenue streams. Right there, when we add in the base of $1.45 billion, that is $2.43 billion. The overall expected 40 year revenue stream to the Raiders in Oakland is $2.8 billion and that is from the stadium, alone and does not include NFL revenue sources or team sponsorship or merchandise sales. But the spreadsheet number comes to $69 million annually. Add that to the $2.43 billion and we have $3.12 billion. So the question remains: if the Raiders are considering a move out of Oakland and to a situation where they are sharing a stadium, it's clear staying in Oakland and using some deal structure close to what I have come up with is better. It also damages any “statement of reasons” the Raiders would give in a relocation filing. In fact, it would make them look, well, you know. Stay tuned.
via IFTTT
http://youtu.be/-uC1uKv7i3s
Chris Christie Gains Steam in Granite State – Yahoo Finance
Chris Christie Gains Steam in Granite StateYahoo FinanceDec 11 — John Heilemann and Al Hunt discuss Chris Christie’s momentum in New Hampshire on “With All Due Respect.” A drink to toast the Golden Globe noms! Now watching Paused Up next. 1:27.. A drink to toast the Golden Globe noms! Enjoy this …and more …read more […]
from WordPress http://ift.tt/1Q9GSfh
via IFTTT
from WordPress http://ift.tt/1Q9GSfh
via IFTTT
NFL Raiders Worth $3 Billion With Privately Financed Oakland Stadium
NFL Raiders Worth $3 Billion With Privately Financed Oakland Stadium - Video
The Oakland Raiders are worth $3 billion with a new privately financed stadium in Oakland. That is more than they would be valued at in Carson, California. The Oakland Raiders have been working at once to stay in Oakland, but also to be part of a two-team NFL stadium planned for Carson, California. The basic assumption has been that Los Angeles is a more valuable region than the San Francisco Bay Area, and in particular Oakland and the East Bay Area. But a look at per capita gross metropolitan economic product, as well as a specific private stadium proposal in Oakland and at the Coliseum, reveals the Raiders would be worth $3 billion if they stayed in Oakland under the scenario you are about to see. The information is important, considering the NFL process for allowing the Raiders to leave Oakland, as stated in its franchise relocation policy. The Raiders are required to offer a “statement of reasons” for wanting to leave Oakland. It appears that one of those reasons would have to be listed as “desire to be in a region where it would be worth less than in Oakland.” That, coupled with any negative representations of Raider Nation in Oakland and in Northern California would be a public relations disaster. It's also important because the parties working on the NFL Carson project in LA don't have a fiscal picture that's that attractive to the Raiders – the team would be sharing a stadium with the San Diego Chargers, that and considering the rather substandard number of luxury suites proposed gives us a scenario where the Raiders down there in LA would only have half ownership of a $1.7 billion stadium and that would come to $850 million. Moreover, the Carson location is part of a metropolitan area that is ranked 17th in per capita gross metropolitan product, where San Francisco and San Jose are ranked number 3 and number 1, and Oakland - which was not part of the Bloomberg survey - sits in between them. That means the Bay Area has more spending money than the LA basin and by a wide margin. Looking At The Stadium Numbers Since the Raiders don't own the Oakland Coliseum, and are worth $1.45 billion, we can conservatively add that to the LA stadium value and come to this figure: $2.3 billion. By contrast, in Oakland, the stadium plan concept that Oakland Raiders Owner Mark Davis asked me to come up with adds up to significant gains for the Silver and Black. The stadium, as well as a stadium for the Oakland A's, would be paid for via an industrial development lease revenue bond issue structure. That means no public subsidy or bond default backing by the government. The new stadium itself is at $900 million in Oakland, so the Raiders are already $50 million ahead in Oakland. The Raiders wing of the hotel is part owned by the team, and so that portion comes in at about $80 million. That base of property pushes the Raiders up by $980 million – and that does not even take in expected revenue streams. Right there, when we add in the base of $1.45 billion, that is $2.43 billion. The overall expected 40 year revenue stream to the Raiders in Oakland is $2.8 billion and that is from the stadium, alone and does not include NFL revenue sources or team sponsorship or merchandise sales. But the spreadsheet number comes to $69 million annually. Add that to the $2.43 billion and we have $3.12 billion. So the question remains: if the Raiders are considering a move out of Oakland and to a situation where they are sharing a stadium, it's clear staying in Oakland and using some deal structure close to what I have come up with is better. It also damages any “statement of reasons” the Raiders would give in a relocation filing. In fact, it would make them look, well, you know. Stay tuned.
via IFTTT
http://youtu.be/-uC1uKv7i3s
The Oakland Raiders are worth $3 billion with a new privately financed stadium in Oakland. That is more than they would be valued at in Carson, California. The Oakland Raiders have been working at once to stay in Oakland, but also to be part of a two-team NFL stadium planned for Carson, California. The basic assumption has been that Los Angeles is a more valuable region than the San Francisco Bay Area, and in particular Oakland and the East Bay Area. But a look at per capita gross metropolitan economic product, as well as a specific private stadium proposal in Oakland and at the Coliseum, reveals the Raiders would be worth $3 billion if they stayed in Oakland under the scenario you are about to see. The information is important, considering the NFL process for allowing the Raiders to leave Oakland, as stated in its franchise relocation policy. The Raiders are required to offer a “statement of reasons” for wanting to leave Oakland. It appears that one of those reasons would have to be listed as “desire to be in a region where it would be worth less than in Oakland.” That, coupled with any negative representations of Raider Nation in Oakland and in Northern California would be a public relations disaster. It's also important because the parties working on the NFL Carson project in LA don't have a fiscal picture that's that attractive to the Raiders – the team would be sharing a stadium with the San Diego Chargers, that and considering the rather substandard number of luxury suites proposed gives us a scenario where the Raiders down there in LA would only have half ownership of a $1.7 billion stadium and that would come to $850 million. Moreover, the Carson location is part of a metropolitan area that is ranked 17th in per capita gross metropolitan product, where San Francisco and San Jose are ranked number 3 and number 1, and Oakland - which was not part of the Bloomberg survey - sits in between them. That means the Bay Area has more spending money than the LA basin and by a wide margin. Looking At The Stadium Numbers Since the Raiders don't own the Oakland Coliseum, and are worth $1.45 billion, we can conservatively add that to the LA stadium value and come to this figure: $2.3 billion. By contrast, in Oakland, the stadium plan concept that Oakland Raiders Owner Mark Davis asked me to come up with adds up to significant gains for the Silver and Black. The stadium, as well as a stadium for the Oakland A's, would be paid for via an industrial development lease revenue bond issue structure. That means no public subsidy or bond default backing by the government. The new stadium itself is at $900 million in Oakland, so the Raiders are already $50 million ahead in Oakland. The Raiders wing of the hotel is part owned by the team, and so that portion comes in at about $80 million. That base of property pushes the Raiders up by $980 million – and that does not even take in expected revenue streams. Right there, when we add in the base of $1.45 billion, that is $2.43 billion. The overall expected 40 year revenue stream to the Raiders in Oakland is $2.8 billion and that is from the stadium, alone and does not include NFL revenue sources or team sponsorship or merchandise sales. But the spreadsheet number comes to $69 million annually. Add that to the $2.43 billion and we have $3.12 billion. So the question remains: if the Raiders are considering a move out of Oakland and to a situation where they are sharing a stadium, it's clear staying in Oakland and using some deal structure close to what I have come up with is better. It also damages any “statement of reasons” the Raiders would give in a relocation filing. In fact, it would make them look, well, you know. Stay tuned.
via IFTTT
http://youtu.be/-uC1uKv7i3s
